Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work · Minnesota

Preferred Electric, Inc.

Minneapolis, MN · ~43 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Preferred Electric, Inc. runs at 37% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work workplace, earning a grade A.

Preferred Electric, Inc.: 1.0 TCR = 37% of Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS 2.8 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Preferred Electric, Inc. safety composite

Preferred Electric, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 21%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

52/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Preferred Electric, Inc.: 0.0 → 5.0 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 3.23× in 2024

Preferred Electric, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 5.0 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 3.23× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238210 · Minneapolis, MN AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 37% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #15/100
  • PHOTO Industrial Division
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Industrial Division (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Preferred Electric, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Preferred Electric, Inc. averages 1.0 TCR (37% of the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Preferred Electric, Inc. TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=5 · BLS 2.8

Where Preferred Electric, Inc. falls in its industry

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, establishments

Safer than 80% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 100 Electrical, electrical wiring, employers in Minnesota.

Preferred Electric, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Preferred Electric, Inc.
Preferred Electric, Inc. (43 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 63 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Preferred Electric, Inc. has fewer employees than the Electrical, electrical wiring, and low v median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.0 3.4 3 0 0
2023 2.2 2.2 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238210 · MN · Minneapolis

4,550 Electrical, electrical wiring, and low voltage electrical work employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 1,321 employers in Minneapolis, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Industrial Division 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Headquarters 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GALLAGHER ELECTRIC, INC. 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 118 Long Pond Road 1.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE United Farmers Cooperative 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Edina Service Center 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wigen Water Technologies 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lennar Multi-Family - Central (MN) 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Minnesota Twin Cities 22,522 FTE
CITY-NEAR MN950 MN TELECOMMUTER 12,021 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0501 - City Center 8,459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hennepin County Medical Center 7,030 FTE
NAT-TCR Bell Supply Company, LLC. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Monterey Mechanical Co. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR ViaSun Corporation 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Knauf Insulation Plant 2 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Halls Food Rite 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Precision Steel Mfg. Corp. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preform Solutions Inc. 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doubleback Transportation, LLC 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.