Sheet, laminated plastics (except flexible packaging), manufacturing · Ohio

Premier Material Concepts

Findlay, OH · ~71 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
6.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Premier Material Concepts runs at 210% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Sheet, laminated plastics (except flexible packaging), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Premier Material Concepts: 6.9 TCR = 210% of Sheet, laminated plastics (except flexible packaging), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Premier Material Concepts safety composite

Premier Material Concepts scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

31/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 6.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.93 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Premier Material Concepts held a steady TCR band

Premier Material Concepts's TCR held near 0.1 from 6.0 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 11.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.42× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=10.7 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=6.0 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326130 · Findlay, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 6.9 · 210% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Ensinger Inc. - Gree…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ensinger Inc. - Greenwood Operations (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Premier Material Concepts in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Premier Material Concepts averages 6.9 TCR (210% of the Sheet, laminated plastics (except flexible packaging), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Premier Material Concepts TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=10.7 · 2019=11.7 · 2020=6 · 2021=6 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=4.5 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Premier Material Concepts falls in its industry

160 Sheet, laminated plastics (exc establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Sheet, laminated plastics (exc employers in Ohio.

Premier Material Concepts (71 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Premier Material Concepts
Premier Material Concepts (71 employees, TCR 6.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 72 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Premier Material Concepts has fewer employees than the Sheet, laminated plastics (except flexib median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 2.9 4 0 0
2023 4.5 3.0 2 1 0
2022 4.8 1.2 4 0 0
2021 6.0 3.0 4 0 0
2020 6.0 3.0 4 0 0
2019 11.7 6.7 7 0 0
2017 10.7 3.1 7 0 0
2016 6.0 2.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326130 · OH · Findlay

160 Sheet, laminated plastics (except flexible packaging), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 184 employers in Findlay, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ensinger Inc. - Greenwood Operations 6.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Adept Corporation 6.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Dimax Corporation 6.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Profile Plastics, Inc. 7.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE DuPont Pioneer Grand Rapids Production GRA1 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rudolph Libbe Inc. - Ford Ohio Assembly Plant, Avon Lake 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE John G. Johnson Construction Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE R&R Pipeline Inc. 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Findlay Campus 2,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whirlpool Corporation 2,266 FTE
CITY-NEAR Whirlpool Corporation - Findlay Operations 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR Blanchard Valley Hospital 1,978 FTE
NAT-TCR Metal Solutions, Inc 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Agri Supply of Valdosta 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Modern Materials, Inc. 6.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Giant 108 6.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morphey Construction 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE WLW Construction 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Tucson 10624 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Water Mill Building Supply, LLC 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.