Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance · North Dakota

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc.

Grand Forks, ND · ~42 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. runs at 19% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance workplace, earning a grade A.

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc.: 0.8 TCR = 19% of Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance BLS 4.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. safety composite

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 93% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

56/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 93% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc.: 0.0 → 5.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.1 TCR · DART/TCR 6× in 2024

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc.'s TCR rose 5.1 from 0.0 in 2016 to 5.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 484230 · Grand Forks, ND AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 19% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO Batesville Logistics…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~42 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Batesville Logistics - Transportation (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. averages 0.8 TCR (19% of the Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=0 · 2024=5.1 · BLS 4.5

Where Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. falls in its industry

1,026 Tracked vehicle freight transp establishments

Safer than 93% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Tracked vehicle freight transp employers in North Dakota.

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. (42 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc.
Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. (42 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. has fewer employees than the Tracked vehicle freight transportation, median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

484230 · ND · Grand Forks

1,026 Tracked vehicle freight transportation, long-distance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 175 employers in Grand Forks, ND · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Batesville Logistics - Transportation 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Altom Transport, Inc. - PASADENA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cryogenic Transportation 64050 New Carlisle 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bob Evans Transportation 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Residential Real Estate Professionals 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE Watford City Mechanic Shop 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE True North Equipment Grand Forks 42 FTE
STATE-SIZE 43959 - FARGO DC 42 FTE
CITY-NEAR Altru Health System Med Park 2,709 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power 907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LM Wind Power : Grand Forks 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valley Eldercare Center 606 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 086 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Doyle Production Plant 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Novelis - GBO 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at the Haverford School 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE United Refrigeration, Inc. (#400) 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hennes Services, Inc. 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Larsen's Landscaping, LLC 42 FTE
NAT-SIZE Imperial Ornamental Metal Co., Inc. dba Imperial Metal Company, Inc. 42 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.