Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) · Maryland

Doyle Production Plant

Hyattsville, MD · ~61 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.8
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Doyle Production Plant runs at 26% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) workplace, earning a grade A.

Doyle Production Plant: 0.8 TCR = 26% of Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Doyle Production Plant safety composite

Doyle Production Plant scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 90% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

77/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 90% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.6

2016→2024

Doyle Production Plant injury rate improved

Doyle Production Plant's TCR fell 1.6 from 1.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 2.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 323111 · Hyattsville, MD AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.8 · 26% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/24
  • PHOTO 1953 TWA
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 1953 TWA (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

Doyle Production Plant in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Doyle Production Plant averages 0.8 TCR (26% of the Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Doyle Production Plant TCR series: 2016=1.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=1.7 · 2019=0 · 2020=2.2 · 2021=2.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Doyle Production Plant falls in its industry

2,001 Offset printing (except books, establishments

Safer than 90% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 24 Offset printing (except books, employers in Maryland.

Doyle Production Plant (61 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Doyle Production Plant
Doyle Production Plant (61 employees, TCR 0.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 76 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Doyle Production Plant has fewer employees than the Offset printing (except books, printing median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 2.2 0.0 1 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 1.6 1.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

323111 · MD · Hyattsville

2,001 Offset printing (except books, printing grey goods) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 81 employers in Hyattsville, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 1953 TWA 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Transcontinental Packaging Clinton 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sun Printing LLC 0.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prisma Nashville 0.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Cossentino Contracting Co., Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Infrastructure Riverdale 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE MACHADO CONSTRUCTION 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mohawk Bridge & Iron, Inc. 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Carmen Turner Facility 1,400 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6900 CARMEN TURNER FACILITY 1,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1810 NEW CARROLLTON HQ 1,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Carrollton Rail Yard 479 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 086 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pro Transport & Leasing, Inc. 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Novelis - GBO 0.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at the Haverford School 0.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stones River Central Office 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forino Co., LP 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lampe & Malphrus Lumber Company - Sawmill 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE B-W Grinding Service, Inc. 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.