Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers · Maine

Process Controls Division 63

Winslow, ME · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
2.5
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Process Controls Division 63 runs at 114% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade C.

Process Controls Division 63: 2.5 TCR = 114% of Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Process Controls Division 63 safety composite

Process Controls Division 63 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 75% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 75% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2024

Process Controls Division 63 injury rate improved

Process Controls Division 63's TCR fell 4.6 from 4.6 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423840 · Winslow, ME ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 2.5 · 114% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK P49
  • PHOTO Branch CSA - Coca Co…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Branch CSA - Coca Cola Parts (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maine employers → · Look up another →

Process Controls Division 63 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Process Controls Division 63 averages 2.5 TCR (114% of the Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Process Controls Division 63 TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.5 · 2019=0 · 2020=8.1 · 2021=0 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.2

Where Process Controls Division 63 falls in its industry

589 Industrial supplies (except di establishments

Safer than 49% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers
Process Controls Division 63 (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Process Controls Division 63
Process Controls Division 63 (41 employees, TCR 2.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 44 employees and a TCR of 2.5

Process Controls Division 63 has fewer employees than the Industrial supplies (except disposable p median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 4.9 2.5 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 8.1 2.7 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.6 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423840 · ME · Winslow

589 Industrial supplies (except disposable plastics, paper) merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,397 rated employers in Maine with headcount on file · 22 employers in Winslow, ME · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Branch CSA - Coca Cola Parts 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lawson Products-Reno DC 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMECO Cincinnati 2.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR SouthernCarlson - Grimes 2.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maine Office 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE FASTCO Corporation 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Haley's Metal Shop, Inc. 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Rock 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alcom LLC 346 FTE
CITY-NEAR Maine 285 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winslow Warehouse 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR Winslow 129 FTE
NAT-TCR Foodland 114 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Integrated Facility Services 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Eversource - Tilton 2.5 TCR
NAT-TCR High Range 2.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fluted Partition 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forristall enterprises, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE RW Patterson Printing Company 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pat's Gradall Service Inc 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.