Partitions, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Connecticut

Fluted Partition

Bridgeport, CT · ~41 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fluted Partition runs at 280% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Partitions, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

Fluted Partition: 9.3 TCR = 280% of Partitions, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fluted Partition safety composite

Fluted Partition scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−10.0

2016→2024

Fluted Partition injury rate improved

Fluted Partition's TCR fell 10.0 from 15.5 in 2016 to 5.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 15.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.3× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=15.5 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=5.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Bridgeport, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.3 · 280% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #11/12
  • PHOTO 9YD Leaman Container…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 33 inj
  • SIZE ~41 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 9YD Leaman Container Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

Fluted Partition in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fluted Partition averages 9.3 TCR (280% of the Partitions, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fluted Partition TCR series: 2016=15.5 · 2017=4.7 · 2018=10.7 · 2019=12.6 · 2020=4.7 · 2021=6 · 2022=11.7 · 2023=11.9 · 2024=5.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Fluted Partition falls in its industry

1,338 Partitions, corrugated and sol establishments

Safer than 3% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #11 safest of 12 Partitions, corrugated and sol employers in Connecticut.

Fluted Partition (41 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Fluted Partition
Fluted Partition (41 employees, TCR 9.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Fluted Partition has fewer employees than the Partitions, corrugated and solid fiber, median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.5 2.8 2 0 0
2023 11.9 9.9 6 0 0
2022 11.7 11.7 4 0 0
2021 6.0 6.0 3 0 0
2020 4.7 0.0 1 1 0
2019 12.6 12.6 5 0 0
2018 10.7 10.7 4 0 0
2017 4.7 4.7 2 0 0
2016 15.5 12.9 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CT · Bridgeport

1,338 Partitions, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 150 employers in Bridgeport, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 9YD Leaman Container Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR All Star Corrugated 9.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Traverse Container-GR 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSC Atlanta 9.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Planters' Choice Nursery LLC 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eversource - Berlin Gas 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Water 41 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hartford Water Pollution Control Facility 41 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bridgeport Hospital 3,332 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Vincent's Medical Center - Bridgeport Campus 2,340 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST VINCENTS MEDICAL CENTER - BRIDGEPORT 2,273 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1855-CTBRI1 2,079 FTE
NAT-TCR 058/Nashville 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Branch 207 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR San Jose Creek Water Reclamation Plant 9.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Larson Acres, Inc. 9.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Process Controls Division 63 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Forristall enterprises, Inc. 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE RW Patterson Printing Company 41 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pat's Gradall Service Inc 41 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.