Cosmetic creams, lotions, and oils manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Process Technologies and Packaging

Scott Township, PA · ~273 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Process Technologies and Packaging runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cosmetic creams, lotions, and oils manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Process Technologies and Packaging: 4.1 TCR = 125% of Cosmetic creams, lotions, and oils manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Process Technologies and Packaging safety composite

Process Technologies and Packaging scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Process Technologies and Packaging: 4.0 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.47× in 2021

Process Technologies and Packaging's TCR rose 0.9 from 4.0 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 5.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · Scott Township, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #6/9
  • PHOTO Hayward Laboratories…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 47 inj
  • SIZE ~273 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Hayward Laboratories Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Process Technologies and Packaging in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Process Technologies and Packaging averages 4.1 TCR (125% of the Cosmetic creams, lotions, and oils manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Process Technologies and Packaging TCR series: 2016=4 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=3.6 · 2020=2.7 · 2021=4.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Process Technologies and Packaging falls in its industry

260 Cosmetic creams, lotions, and establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 9 Cosmetic creams, lotions, and employers in Pennsylvania.

Process Technologies and Packaging (273 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Process Technologies and Packaging
Process Technologies and Packaging (273 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Process Technologies and Packaging has more employees than the Cosmetic creams, lotions, and oils manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 4.9 2.0 10 0 0
2020 2.7 2.7 4 0 0
2019 3.6 3.6 9 0 0
2018 5.6 4.0 11 0 0
2016 4.0 4.0 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · PA · Scott Township

260 Cosmetic creams, lotions, and oils manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 4 employers in Scott Township, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Hayward Laboratories Inc. 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pharmasol 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HK Kolmar USA 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gillette Company, LLC - North Chicago Plant 4.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Heavy Highway Construction 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Coastal Drilling East, LLC 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Schlouch Incorporated 273 FTE
STATE-SIZE Veeder-Root (Altoona) 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR 165 89 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAID RITE SPECIALTY FOODS INC EB 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Altasciences Preclinical Scranton, Inc 81 FTE
NAT-TCR Swg Bullhead City Office 0034-Fac05 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 049 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR EHA 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 3210 Sw Stallings Dr 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC-042 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Endicott 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Finance Department 273 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hammonton 273 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.