Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing · Pennsylvania

Hayward Laboratories Inc.

East Stroudsburg, PA · ~275 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Hayward Laboratories Inc. runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Hayward Laboratories Inc.: 4.1 TCR = 125% of Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Hayward Laboratories Inc. safety composite

Hayward Laboratories Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 22%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

30/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.9

2016→2024

Hayward Laboratories Inc. injury rate improved

Hayward Laboratories Inc.'s TCR fell 0.9 from 4.0 in 2016 to 3.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.0 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.6 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=3.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · East Stroudsburg, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.1 · 125% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #5/9
  • PHOTO Pharmasol
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 54 inj
  • SIZE ~275 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pharmasol (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Hayward Laboratories Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Hayward Laboratories Inc. averages 4.1 TCR (125% of the Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Hayward Laboratories Inc. TCR series: 2016=4 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=4.6 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=3 · BLS 3.3

Where Hayward Laboratories Inc. falls in its industry

260 Lotions (e.g., body, face, han establishments

Safer than 22% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #5 safest of 9 Lotions (e.g., body, face, han employers in Pennsylvania.

Hayward Laboratories Inc. (275 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Hayward Laboratories Inc.
Hayward Laboratories Inc. (275 employees, TCR 4.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Hayward Laboratories Inc. has more employees than the Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.0 2.7 8 0 0
2023 3.5 3.5 8 0 0
2018 4.6 3.9 11 2 0
2017 5.5 4.5 17 0 0
2016 4.0 3.6 10 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · PA · East Stroudsburg

260 Lotions (e.g., body, face, hand) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 42 employers in East Stroudsburg, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pharmasol 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Process Technologies and Packaging 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Gillette Company, LLC - North Chicago Plant 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR HK Kolmar USA 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE AES Clean Technology (All Divisions) 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Devault Foods 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shank's Extracts, LLC d.b.a. Universal Ingredients - Shank's 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Libertas Copper LLC dba Hussey Copper 275 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lehigh Vaelly Hospital-Pocono 1,784 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hospital 1,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR LVH-Pocono 1,327 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2368 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Reliance Worldwide Corp. Cullman DC 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Joe Gibbs Racing LLC - NC: XFN, DEV 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Colonial Diversified Polymer Products 4.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Omni Glass & Paint, LLC 4.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE New Mexico Oncology Hematology Consultants, Ltd.. 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Winter Haven 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Seneca Foods Corporation 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE THK Rhythm North America 275 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.