Airports, civil, operation and maintenance · Ohio

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations

Cincinnati, OH · ~34 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.9
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations runs at 20% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Airports, civil, operation and maintenance workplace, earning a grade A.

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations: 0.9 TCR = 20% of Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations safety composite

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 96% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 96% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations: 0.0 → 2.8 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 2.8 TCR · DART/TCR 2.99× in 2023

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.0 in 2016 to 2.8 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 2.99× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · Cincinnati, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.9 · 20% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #4/25
  • PHOTO Siemens Logistics
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Siemens Logistics (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations averages 0.9 TCR (20% of the Airports, civil, operation and maintenance BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations TCR series: 2016=0 · 2020=0 · 2023=2.8 · BLS 4.5

Where Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations falls in its industry

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and establishments

Safer than 96% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 25 Airports, civil, operation and employers in Ohio.

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations (34 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations
Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations (34 employees, TCR 0.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations has fewer employees than the Airports, civil, operation and maintenan median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · OH · Cincinnati

1,555 Airports, civil, operation and maintenance employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 1,513 employers in Cincinnati, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Siemens Logistics 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Trajen Flight Support LP - ELP 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Prospect Airport Services Corporate 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR DGS Aviation Services : FLL - Fort Lauderdale 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bauman Orchards Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Millcreek Gardens LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meadow View Growers, Inc 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE ayers farms inc 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center 17,011 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cincinnati Operations 10,239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain : Evendale, OH 7,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR Supply Chain Evendale OH 6,400 FTE
NAT-TCR Florida Components Corporation 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR EM Printing 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Wayne County Schools 0.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 281-NiSource-Connellsville PA-Construct MOD 0.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE SIC Lazaro US, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koch Industries Distribution Center 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE GreenBroz Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lowell C Hagen Trucking, Inc. 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.