Concrete products forming machinery manufacturing · Wisconsin

SIC Lazaro US, Inc

Milwaukee, WI · ~34 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

SIC Lazaro US, Inc runs at 371% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Concrete products forming machinery manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

SIC Lazaro US, Inc: 12.3 TCR = 371% of Concrete products forming machinery manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

SIC Lazaro US, Inc safety composite

SIC Lazaro US, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

14/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.25 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 19.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

SIC Lazaro US, Inc: 10.8 → 25.8 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 28.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.58× in 2023

SIC Lazaro US, Inc's TCR rose 15.0 from 10.8 in 2016 to 25.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 28.4 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333249 · Milwaukee, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 371% of ind

  • DART 19.3 DART
  • RANK #30/32
  • PHOTO Granite Valley Fores…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 26 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Granite Valley Forest Products (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

SIC Lazaro US, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows SIC Lazaro US, Inc averages 12.3 TCR (371% of the Concrete products forming machinery manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

SIC Lazaro US, Inc TCR series: 2016=10.8 · 2017=16 · 2018=28.4 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=4.3 · 2021=5.3 · 2022=4.8 · 2023=25.8 · BLS 3.3

Where SIC Lazaro US, Inc falls in its industry

448 Concrete products forming mach establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #30 safest of 32 Concrete products forming mach employers in Wisconsin.

SIC Lazaro US, Inc (34 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate SIC Lazaro US, Inc
SIC Lazaro US, Inc (34 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 70 employees and a TCR of 3.0

SIC Lazaro US, Inc has fewer employees than the Concrete products forming machinery manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 25.8 19.3 4 0 0
2022 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2021 5.3 5.3 1 0 0
2020 4.3 0.0 1 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 1 0 0
2018 28.4 28.4 8 0 0
2017 16.0 8.0 6 0 0
2016 10.8 10.8 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333249 · WI · Milwaukee

448 Concrete products forming machinery manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 980 employers in Milwaukee, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Granite Valley Forest Products 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jomar Corp 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Universal Plastics 12.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRIPOS, INC. 11.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Drumlin Dairy, LLC 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Merrillan East Coating 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bayfront Steam Plant-5D 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center 7,587 FTE
CITY-NEAR FROEDTERT HOSPITAL 7,328 FTE
CITY-NEAR Milwaukee Hospital 3,398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Childrens Hospital - Milw Campus 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR Atria West 86 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Classic Healthcare Systems dba Franklin Ridge 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Prospect Airport Services DTW FLT 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Indeed Brewing Company - Minneapolis Brewery 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE HB Chemical Corp 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE GreenBroz Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Procter and Gamble Global Flight Operations 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Koch Industries Distribution Center 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.