Airport baggage handling services · California

Prospect International Airport Services SFO

San Francisco, CA · ~189 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prospect International Airport Services SFO runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Airport baggage handling services workplace, earning a grade C.

Prospect International Airport Services SFO: 5.0 TCR = 111% of Airport baggage handling services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prospect International Airport Services SFO safety composite

Prospect International Airport Services SFO scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 85% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 46%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

61/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 85% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.1

2019→2021

Prospect International Airport Services SFO injury rate improved

Prospect International Airport Services SFO's TCR fell 4.1 from 5.3 in 2019 to 1.2 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 8.5 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=5.3 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 488119 · San Francisco, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 5.0 · 111% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #68/166
  • PHOTO JAN JAN
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~189 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JAN JAN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Prospect International Airport Services SFO in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prospect International Airport Services SFO averages 5.0 TCR (111% of the Airport baggage handling services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prospect International Airport Services SFO TCR series: 2019=5.3 · 2020=8.5 · 2021=1.2 · BLS 4.5

Where Prospect International Airport Services SFO falls in its industry

1,555 Airport baggage handling servi establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #68 safest of 166 Airport baggage handling servi employers in California.

Prospect International Airport Services SFO (189 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Prospect International Airport Services SFO
Prospect International Airport Services SFO (189 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Prospect International Airport Services SFO has more employees than the Airport baggage handling services median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 8.5 8.5 6 1 0
2019 5.3 4.2 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

488119 · CA · San Francisco

1,555 Airport baggage handling services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JAN JAN 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheltair Aviation JAX 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001316 CHS - 316 CHARLESTON INTL AIRPORT 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 00001250 MKE-250 MILWAUKEE MITCHELL INT L AIRPORT 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fallbrook 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Youngstown Grape Dist., Inc 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Moonlight Companies Plant 4/MCSI 4 189 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sentinel Peak Resources 189 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Ross' Granville Market 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Pharma Labs Inc. 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rosboro Manufacturing 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR St. Clair, MI 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Morris Hall Skilled Nursing Facility 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE ICI Holdings, LLC 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Co-Line Welding, Inc. 189 FTE
NAT-SIZE Truitt Bros., Inc. KY 189 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.