mecahnical contractor · Ohio

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc.

Youngstown, OH · ~40 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. runs at 279% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical mecahnical contractor workplace, earning a grade F.

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc.: 7.8 TCR = 279% of mecahnical contractor BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. safety composite

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 80% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 17%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 17% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.2

2016→2024

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. injury rate improved

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc.'s TCR fell 6.2 from 6.2 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 28.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.2 · 2017=28.2 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=0.0 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Youngstown, OH ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 279% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #275/300
  • PHOTO Fulkerson Plumbing &…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~40 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fulkerson Plumbing & Heating, Co., Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. averages 7.8 TCR (279% of the mecahnical contractor BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. TCR series: 2016=6.2 · 2017=28.2 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=0 · 2023=6.4 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. falls in its industry

5,793 mecahnical contractor establishments

Safer than 17% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #275 safest of 300 mecahnical contractor employers in Ohio.

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc.
Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. (40 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Prout Boiler, Heating & Welding, Inc. has fewer employees than the mecahnical contractor median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 6.4 4.3 3 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 6.1 3.1 2 0 0
2017 28.2 28.2 6 0 0
2016 6.2 3.1 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · OH · Youngstown

5,793 mecahnical contractor employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 276 employers in Youngstown, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fulkerson Plumbing & Heating, Co., Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR TriMyc Mechanical 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Climate Systems, Inc. 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR FIRST QUALITY PLUMBING 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Croton Pullet 2 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Chemsteel Construction Company 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE BluSky Restoration Contractors Toledo 40 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Construction Company LLC (Akron) 40 FTE
CITY-NEAR St. Elizabeth Health Center 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mercy Health St Elizabeth Health Hospital 2,679 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ohio Edison Company 832 FTE
CITY-NEAR Vallourec Star, LP 681 FTE
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Dcps Cluster 1 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Gobierno Municipal De Isabela 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Weld Mold Company 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Pennington County LEC/Justice Center 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Architectural Millwork of Santa Barbara 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land's Palm Trees, Inc. 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diversified Marine, Inc 40 FTE
NAT-SIZE C046 Terre Haute 40 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.