Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · Washington

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base

Seattle, WA · ~151 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base runs at 385% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade F.

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base: 4.6 TCR = 385% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base safety composite

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

23/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 22% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base held a steady TCR band

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base's TCR held near 0.2 from 4.5 in 2020 to 4.7 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.34× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=4.5 · 2023=4.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Seattle, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.6 · 385% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #12/14
  • PHOTO Somerset Operating C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~151 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Somerset Operating Company LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base averages 4.6 TCR (385% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base TCR series: 2020=4.5 · 2023=4.7 · BLS 1.2

Where PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #12 safest of 14 Electric power generation, fos employers in Washington.

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base (151 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base
PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base (151 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

PSE, GTO - Georgetown Operating Base has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.7 1.6 5 1 0
2020 4.5 0.7 1 6 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · WA · Seattle

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 1,279 employers in Seattle, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Somerset Operating Company LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR PORT JEFFERSON STATION-NY69 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Southwest Energy Solutions (North / SGS) 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mountaineer 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Flynn BEC LP - Spokane 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cosmo Specialty Fibers 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE LANXESS Corporation - Kalama 151 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westport LLC Westport WA 151 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Seattle 32,378 FTE
CITY-NEAR The United States of America 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR Starz Entertainment 25,000 FTE
CITY-NEAR UW Medical Center - Montlake and NW 11,307 FTE
NAT-TCR North America Fire Equipment Co., Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Plano 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #4663 Chesterfield, M 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Big Lots Store #5352 South Point, OH 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Palmetto Prince George Operating DBA Prince George Healthcare Center 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gdc 1 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE C&A Industries, LLC 151 FTE
NAT-SIZE FUJIFILM Cellular Dynamics- Madison, WI 151 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.