Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution · New Jersey

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions

Newark, NJ · ~116 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution workplace, earning a grade C.

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution BLS 1.2 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions safety composite

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions held a steady TCR band

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2020 at 0.0 TCR.

2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Newark, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/14
  • PHOTO ENTERGY CORPORATE BL…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ENTERGY CORPORATE BLDG. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · BLS 1.2

Where PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Transmission Co establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 14 Electric Power Transmission Co employers in New Jersey.

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions (116 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions
PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions (116 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions has more employees than the Electric Power Transmission Control and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NJ · Newark

2,958 Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ENTERGY CORPORATE BLDG. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Corporate Headquarters 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 411 Headquarters 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR AHOSKIE 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Cranbury NJ 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE BIS Multi Site Cherry Hill NJ 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linde - Alpha (EPP) 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fisk Alloy Wire 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR California Department of Transportation Facility 128 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Integration Appliance Inc. 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Airborn Inc. Addison 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Keller Warehouse 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE NAPA Auto Parts - Los Angeles DC 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pete's Fresh Market 118th Corporation 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #2842 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Unit #1960 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.