Wire, mechanical, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants · New Jersey

Fisk Alloy Wire

Hawthorne, NJ · ~116 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fisk Alloy Wire runs at 140% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Wire, mechanical, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants workplace, earning a grade D.

Fisk Alloy Wire: 4.6 TCR = 140% of Wire, mechanical, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fisk Alloy Wire safety composite

Fisk Alloy Wire scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.63 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2017

Fisk Alloy Wire injury rate improved

Fisk Alloy Wire's TCR fell 2.8 from 6.0 in 2016 to 3.3 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 6.0 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=6.0 · 2017=3.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 331420 · Hawthorne, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 140% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/6
  • PHOTO The Electrical Mater…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~116 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Electrical Material Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Fisk Alloy Wire in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fisk Alloy Wire averages 4.6 TCR (140% of the Wire, mechanical, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fisk Alloy Wire TCR series: 2016=6 · 2017=3.3 · BLS 3.3

Where Fisk Alloy Wire falls in its industry

198 Wire, mechanical, copper and c establishments

Safer than 39% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 6 Wire, mechanical, copper and c employers in New Jersey.

Fisk Alloy Wire (116 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Fisk Alloy Wire
Fisk Alloy Wire (116 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 113 employees and a TCR of 3.7

Fisk Alloy Wire has more employees than the Wire, mechanical, copper and copper allo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 3.3 0.8 2 2 0
2016 6.0 3.0 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

331420 · NJ · Hawthorne

198 Wire, mechanical, copper and copper alloy, made from purchased copper or in integrated secondary smelting and rolling, drawing or extruding plants employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 24 employers in Hawthorne, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Electrical Material Company 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Copperweld Bimetallics LLC - East Park 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Culloden, WV 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR American Wire and Cable Co 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE PSE&G NJ Renewables & Energy Solutions 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Cranbury NJ 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE BIS Multi Site Cherry Hill NJ 116 FTE
STATE-SIZE Linde - Alpha (EPP) 116 FTE
CITY-NEAR Premio Foods Inc - Hawthorne 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR Churchill Living LLC 314 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hawthorne 238 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2662-4037 97 FTE
NAT-TCR Giant Eagle #3154 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Unadilla (Gauna) 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR The Pines 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR COMPOSITES_CLEARWATER_FL 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Assisted Transportation Services - Kansas City 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE CC019 - Snohomish Office 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gastonia (Ncgas) 116 FTE
NAT-SIZE Heritage Health - Danville 116 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.