Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution · New Jersey

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services

Newark, NJ · ~392 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
0.7
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services runs at 55% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution workplace, earning a grade B.

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services: 0.7 TCR = 55% of Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution BLS 1.2 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services safety composite

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 91% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

68/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 91% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.5 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services held a steady TCR band

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.5 in 2021 to 0.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 0.9 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=0.5 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221122 · Newark, NJ AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 0.7 · 55% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #4/14
  • PHOTO LEXINGTON DISTRICT O…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~392 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: LEXINGTON DISTRICT OFFICE (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services averages 0.7 TCR (55% of the Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services TCR series: 2021=0.5 · 2022=0.9 · 2023=0.5 · BLS 1.2

Where PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services falls in its industry

2,958 Electric Power Transmission Co establishments

Safer than 91% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 14 Electric Power Transmission Co employers in New Jersey.

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services (392 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services
PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services (392 employees, TCR 0.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 2.5

PSE&G NJ Transf & Centralized Services has more employees than the Electric Power Transmission Control and median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 0.5 0.5 1 1 0
2022 0.9 0.9 4 0 0
2021 0.5 0.5 0 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221122 · NJ · Newark

2,958 Electric Power Transmission Control and Distribution employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 356 employers in Newark, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR LEXINGTON DISTRICT OFFICE 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR LADWP 221 FIGUEROA 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Limon Headquarters 0.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR AMEREN MISSOURI - Underground 0.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Shop Rite if Livingston 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5087 392 FTE
STATE-SIZE Phillips 66 Bayway Refinery 393 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2003 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR EWR 13,545 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWR - Airport United Airlines Offices 13,015 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6925-EWR 11,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR EWRPW9829 EWR - NON AA PAX SER 4,772 FTE
NAT-TCR North Sacramento MLS 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MAU at Kimberly-Clark Hendersonville 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Medical University of Sc 0.7 TCR
NAT-TCR CLE 0.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Banking Services Corp dba Bel Air Auto Auction 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sterling Foods 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rapid City Medical Center, LLP 392 FTE
NAT-SIZE Castleview Hospital 392 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.