Civil service commissions · California

Public Utilities Commission

San Francisco, CA · ~756 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Public Utilities Commission runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Civil service commissions workplace, earning a grade A.

Public Utilities Commission: 1.0 TCR = 30% of Civil service commissions BLS 3.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Public Utilities Commission safety composite

Public Utilities Commission scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 82% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.7

2017→2024

Public Utilities Commission injury rate improved

Public Utilities Commission's TCR fell 1.7 from 1.7 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 2.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 921190 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 1.0 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #32/256
  • PHOTO Los Angeles City Pla…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 42 inj
  • SIZE ~756 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Los Angeles City Planning - 221 Figueroa Plaza (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Public Utilities Commission in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Public Utilities Commission averages 1.0 TCR (30% of the Civil service commissions BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Public Utilities Commission TCR series: 2017=1.7 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=1.9 · 2020=0.3 · 2021=1.2 · 2022=0 · 2023=0.3 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.2

Where Public Utilities Commission falls in its industry

1,496 Civil service commissions establishments

Safer than 87% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #32 safest of 256 Civil service commissions employers in California.

Public Utilities Commission (756 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate Public Utilities Commission
Public Utilities Commission (756 employees, TCR 1.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 93 employees and a TCR of 4.6

Public Utilities Commission has more employees than the Civil service commissions median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.3 0.2 1 1 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 1.2 1.0 7 0 0
2020 0.3 0.3 2 0 0
2019 1.9 1.5 11 0 0
2018 2.3 1.6 11 2 0
2017 1.7 1.6 10 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

921190 · CA · San Francisco

1,496 Civil service commissions employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Los Angeles City Planning - 221 Figueroa Plaza 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CM2 - COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE 1.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR COLISEO RAUL PIPOTE OLIVERAS/FINANZAS/OFICALCALDE/RECDEPORRTES/PRIMERADAMA/CONTROLAMBIENTAL 0.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arizona Department of Administration 0.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Indio CA Install 756 FTE
STATE-SIZE Santa Fe Springs, CA - 02 755 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vans Distribution Center - SFS 757 FTE
STATE-SIZE 056835-SAN JOSE CA P&DC 755 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco 18,070 FTE
CITY-NEAR DoorDash, Inc. 12,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR UC San Francisco Health 12,262 FTE
CITY-NEAR SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices 11,622 FTE
NAT-TCR Ostrom Painting & Sandblasting, Inc 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Radius Systems, LLC - Chadds Ford Office 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Easiway Systems, Inc. 1.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Jensen Rock & Sand 1.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brenham 01 756 FTE
NAT-SIZE CAMC Women and Children's Hospital 756 FTE
NAT-SIZE University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center 756 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne Memorial Hospital 756 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.