Hospital · Maryland

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center

La Plata, MD · ~756 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
7.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center runs at 27% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Hospital workplace, earning a grade A.

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center: 2.0 TCR = 27% of Hospital BLS 7.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center safety composite

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 89% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

76/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 89% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0.52 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center: 0.2 → 2.9 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.25× in 2024

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center's TCR rose 2.8 from 0.2 in 2022 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 3.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.25× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 622110 · La Plata, MD AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 2.0 · 27% of ind

  • DART 0.5 DART
  • RANK #10/70
  • PHOTO Collingsworth Genera…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~756 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Collingsworth General Hospital (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Maryland employers → · Look up another →

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center averages 2.0 TCR (27% of the Hospital BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center TCR series: 2022=0.2 · 2023=3 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 7.5

Where University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center falls in its industry

6,862 Hospital establishments

Safer than 89% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Maryland alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #10 safest of 70 Hospital employers in Maryland.

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center (756 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center
University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center (756 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 492 employees and a TCR of 5.2

University of Maryland Charles Regional Medical Center has more employees than the Hospital median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 0.5 17 0 0
2023 3.0 1.3 16 1 0
2022 0.2 0.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

622110 · MD · La Plata

6,862 Hospital employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,213 rated employers in Maryland with headcount on file · 26 employers in La Plata, MD · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Collingsworth General Hospital 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR CHRISTUS St. Frances Cabrini Hospital 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6308 8th Avenue 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Behavioral Health Services HQ 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE MDGAI - GAITHERSBURG-PACKAGE CENTER 759 FTE
STATE-SIZE 24-262105914-0 753 FTE
STATE-SIZE MD0288CB2 760 FTE
STATE-SIZE Springfield Hospital Center 750 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charles County Government 1,751 FTE
CITY-NEAR Charles County Sheriff's Office 639 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2853 307 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2853 282 FTE
NAT-TCR Material Handling Division 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sig Sauer (Exeter) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Carrigan Brothers, LLC 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Arrow Exterminators 1066 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Indio CA Install 756 FTE
NAT-SIZE Public Utilities Commission 756 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne Memorial Hospital 756 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brenham 01 756 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.