Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs · California

Public Works & Facilities

Auburn, CA · ~354 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.0
Avg TCR
3.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Public Works & Facilities runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs workplace, earning a grade D.

Public Works & Facilities: 5.0 TCR = 155% of Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs BLS 3.2 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Public Works & Facilities safety composite

Public Works & Facilities scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.53 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.7

2017→2018

Public Works & Facilities injury rate improved

Public Works & Facilities's TCR fell 0.7 from 5.3 in 2017 to 4.6 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.3 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.71× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.3 · 2018=4.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 926120 · Auburn, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.0 · 155% of ind

  • DART 3.5 DART
  • RANK #7/18
  • PHOTO Dept. of Transporta…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 31 inj
  • SIZE ~354 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (101) (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Public Works & Facilities in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Public Works & Facilities averages 5.0 TCR (155% of the Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Public Works & Facilities TCR series: 2017=5.3 · 2018=4.6 · BLS 3.2

Where Public Works & Facilities falls in its industry

208 Regulation and Administration establishments

Safer than 34% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 18 Regulation and Administration employers in California.

Public Works & Facilities (354 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 01,0002,0003,0004,0005,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Public Works & Facilities
Public Works & Facilities (354 employees, TCR 5.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 172 employees and a TCR of 3.6

Public Works & Facilities has more employees than the Regulation and Administration of Transpo median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 4.6 3.5 17 0 0
2017 5.3 2.6 14 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

926120 · CA · Auburn

208 Regulation and Administration of Transportation Programs employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 96 employers in Auburn, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Dept. of Transportation & Public Facilities (101) 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williamsburg Residency 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR KYTC District 4 5.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR District 9 5.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walt Oxley Enterprises 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE NPL West LLC - Southern California 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE On-Time Air Conditioning and Heating 354 FTE
STATE-SIZE Anning-Johnson Company Northern California 354 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 37 2,161 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Valley Hospitals (30095) 762 FTE
CITY-NEAR Health and Human Services 743 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sutter Auburn Faith Hospital (110-4001) 676 FTE
NAT-TCR 07 - Chesapeake & Newport News 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Weathercraft of North Platte 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Conley Terminal 5.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Store #92 (Kennewick, WA) 5.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lewan and Associates 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE Senior Care Centers Corporate Office TX 354 FTE
NAT-SIZE IOS Holdings, Inc. 354 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.