Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) · California

Puente Hills Field Office

Whittier, CA · ~21 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Puente Hills Field Office runs at 387% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) workplace, earning a grade F.

Puente Hills Field Office: 10.1 TCR = 387% of Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) BLS 2.6 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Puente Hills Field Office safety composite

Puente Hills Field Office scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

45/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Puente Hills Field Office held a steady TCR band

Puente Hills Field Office's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 45.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=45.5 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Whittier, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 387% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #31/41
  • PHOTO Modern Disposal Jeff…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Modern Disposal Jeffrey (0.2 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Puente Hills Field Office in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Puente Hills Field Office averages 10.1 TCR (387% of the Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Puente Hills Field Office TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=14.9 · 2023=45.5 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.6

Where Puente Hills Field Office falls in its industry

288 Dumps, nonhazardous solid wast establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 41 Dumps, nonhazardous solid wast employers in California.

Puente Hills Field Office (21 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Puente Hills Field Office
Puente Hills Field Office (21 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Puente Hills Field Office has fewer employees than the Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., t median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 45.5 45.5 0 8 0
2022 14.9 14.9 0 3 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · CA · Whittier

288 Dumps, nonhazardous solid waste (e.g., trash) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 124 employers in Whittier, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Modern Disposal Jeffrey 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Refuse solid waste 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Greater Greenville Sanitation 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 3130-Loess Hills Landfill 10.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Poso Ridge,LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fonseca & Fonseca, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE TELESIS ONION CO., INC. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mayflower Farms Inc 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIH Health Hospital - Whittier 3,609 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 499 2,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIH Health Hospital - Downey 1,130 FTE
CITY-NEAR PIH Health Physicians 819 FTE
NAT-TCR Simcote, Inc. - OH 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Messier & Associates, Inc. 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TXD087 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR TXA011 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Runnings of Carrington 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mary Greeley Medical Center- Israel Family Hospice House 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE THERM-O-ROCK EAST, INC.- Donora Plant 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Stone Masters, Inc. 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.