Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills · South Carolina

Greater Greenville Sanitation

Greenville, SC · ~67 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.8
Avg TCR
2.6
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Greater Greenville Sanitation runs at 376% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills workplace, earning a grade F.

Greater Greenville Sanitation: 9.8 TCR = 376% of Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS 2.6 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Greater Greenville Sanitation safety composite

Greater Greenville Sanitation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.78 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.45 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.5

2018→2021

Greater Greenville Sanitation injury rate improved

Greater Greenville Sanitation's TCR fell 5.5 from 14.6 in 2018 to 9.1 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 14.6 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.86× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=14.6 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=8.0 · 2021=9.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 562212 · Greenville, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.8 · 376% of ind

  • DART 8.4 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Refuse solid waste
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Refuse solid waste (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Greater Greenville Sanitation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Greater Greenville Sanitation averages 9.8 TCR (376% of the Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Greater Greenville Sanitation TCR series: 2018=14.6 · 2019=7.5 · 2020=8 · 2021=9.1 · BLS 2.6

Where Greater Greenville Sanitation falls in its industry

288 Refuse collecting and operatin establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Refuse collecting and operatin employers in South Carolina.

Greater Greenville Sanitation (67 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Greater Greenville Sanitation
Greater Greenville Sanitation (67 employees, TCR 9.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 32 employees and a TCR of 3.9

Greater Greenville Sanitation has more employees than the Refuse collecting and operating solid wa median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 9.1 8.4 14 1 0
2020 8.0 7.3 12 0 0
2019 7.5 6.1 11 0 0
2018 14.6 12.8 16 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

562212 · SC · Greenville

288 Refuse collecting and operating solid waste landfills employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 573 employers in Greenville, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Refuse solid waste 9.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Modern Disposal Jeffrey 9.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR County of Spotsylvania 9.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Puente Hills Field Office 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Duncan Operations Center 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Oconee 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Columbia Gas Crew Quarters 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cooper River Partners, LLC 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR GREENVILLE MEMORIAL MED CAMPUS 6,132 FTE
CITY-NEAR St Francis Health System 3,395 FTE
CITY-NEAR Gas Power Systems : Greenville, SC, USA 2,971 FTE
CITY-NEAR GSC : Greenville, SC, USA 2,673 FTE
NAT-TCR Charlene Manor Extended Care 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. dba Farner-Bocken 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Hathorne Hill 9.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Vidant Home Hospice - Kenansville 9.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Machine Shop 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Huntington Health Care 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Focus Health (Stockton) 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Diebold Nixdorf Sacramento CA 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.