Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing · North Carolina

Purolator-Facet Inc.

Greensboro, NC · ~34 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
5.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Purolator-Facet Inc. runs at 53% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Purolator-Facet Inc.: 2.9 TCR = 53% of Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS 5.4 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Purolator-Facet Inc. safety composite

Purolator-Facet Inc. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 31%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

46/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 2.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 31% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Purolator-Facet Inc. held a steady TCR band

Purolator-Facet Inc.'s TCR held near 0.3 from 3.0 in 2016 to 2.7 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 3.0 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.95× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.0 · 2017=2.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336390 · Greensboro, NC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 53% of ind

  • DART 2.7 DART
  • RANK #15/24
  • PHOTO Decostar Distributio…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~34 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Decostar Distribution Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Purolator-Facet Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Purolator-Facet Inc. averages 2.9 TCR (53% of the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Purolator-Facet Inc. TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=2.7 · BLS 5.4

Where Purolator-Facet Inc. falls in its industry

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 24 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil employers in North Carolina.

Purolator-Facet Inc. (34 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Purolator-Facet Inc.
Purolator-Facet Inc. (34 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 154 employees and a TCR of 3.2

Purolator-Facet Inc. has fewer employees than the Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) au median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 2.7 2.7 1 0 0
2016 3.0 3.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336390 · NC · Greensboro

772 Filters (e.g., air, engine oil, fuel) automotive, truck, and bus, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 920 employers in Greensboro, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Decostar Distribution Center 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ventra Sandusky 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Donaldson Company, Inc. 2.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Maxion Wheels - Sedalia, LLC 2.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Jerry G. Williams & Sons, Inc. 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2778 NC 50 South, Benson, NC 27504 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Frontier Natural Gas 34 FTE
STATE-SIZE Iredell Operations Center 34 FTE
CITY-NEAR MHCMH-Cone-Moses H Cone Memorial Hospital 3,806 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government - All Employees 3,270 FTE
CITY-NEAR Guilford County Local Government 3,194 FTE
CITY-NEAR NCGRE - GREENSBORO HUB 2,447 FTE
NAT-TCR Forsyth Manor Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR US - Supply Chain : 0004 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR UG2 - 470 - One Financial Center 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hyatt Place Fredericksburg - Mary Washington 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Glenn E. Sessions & Sons 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Haley, Chisholm & Morris, Inc. 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caliber, Inc 34 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1034 Southern York Co. School District 34 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.