Manufacture jet engine disks and blades; overhaul repair, and test jet engines. · Georgia

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site

Columbus, GA · ~1,605 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site runs at 42% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Manufacture jet engine disks and blades; overhaul repair, and test jet engines. workplace, earning a grade A.

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site: 1.4 TCR = 42% of Manufacture jet engine disks and blades; overhaul repair, and test jet engines. BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site safety composite

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 58% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 58% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2016→2020

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site injury rate improved

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site's TCR fell 0.6 from 1.8 in 2016 to 1.2 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 1.8 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0.57× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=1.8 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336412 · Columbus, GA AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 42% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #3/9
  • PHOTO Rolls-Royce Defense …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 105 inj
  • SIZE ~1,605 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Rolls-Royce Defense Services NASM (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows P&W Columbus, Georgia Site averages 1.4 TCR (42% of the Manufacture jet engine disks and blades; overhaul repair, and test jet engines. BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site TCR series: 2016=1.8 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=1.5 · 2019=1.2 · 2020=1.2 · BLS 3.3

Where P&W Columbus, Georgia Site falls in its industry

366 Manufacture jet engine disks a establishments

Safer than 58% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #3 safest of 9 Manufacture jet engine disks a employers in Georgia.

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (1,605 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02,0004,0006,0008,000 012345 Average employees Total Case Rate P&W Columbus, Georgia Site
P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (1,605 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 155 employees and a TCR of 1.6

P&W Columbus, Georgia Site has more employees than the Manufacture jet engine disks and blades; median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 1.2 0.8 20 0 0
2019 1.2 1.0 21 0 0
2018 1.5 1.1 24 0 0
2017 1.2 0.6 18 0 0
2016 1.8 1.0 22 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336412 · GA · Columbus

366 Manufacture jet engine disks and blades; overhaul repair, and test jet engines. employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 291 employers in Columbus, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce Defense Services NASM 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rolls-Royce: Plant 5/Plant 8 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Safran Test Cells 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Air Technology Engines 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE UPS SUPPLY CHAIN SOLUTIONS (GAAPR) 1,606 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hamilton Medical Center 1,606 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1101 Home Office 1,598 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alcon JCM 1,596 FTE
CITY-NEAR ST FRANCIS HEALTH LLC 2,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Columbus Midtown Hospital 1,890 FTE
CITY-NEAR P&W Columbus, Georgia Site (Main Campus) 1,838 FTE
CITY-NEAR Paul S Amos Campus 1,748 FTE
NAT-TCR Nissan of Fort Worth 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR EHP-Utica 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR LSI Cincinnati 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Waxahachie SSC 1I 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE 2545SCHOE 1,605 FTE
NAT-SIZE Baptist Health Paducah Hospital 1,605 FTE
NAT-SIZE The William W Backus Hospital 1,604 FTE
NAT-SIZE Polaris Industries 1,604 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.