Integrated-circuit testers manufacturing · New Hampshire

QA Technology Company, Inc.

Hampton, NH · ~73 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QA Technology Company, Inc. runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Integrated-circuit testers manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

QA Technology Company, Inc.: 3.2 TCR = 98% of Integrated-circuit testers manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QA Technology Company, Inc. safety composite

QA Technology Company, Inc. scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2017→2024

QA Technology Company, Inc. injury rate improved

QA Technology Company, Inc.'s TCR fell 2.8 from 5.7 in 2017 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 5.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.9× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=5.7 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Hampton, NH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.2 · 98% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #6/7
  • PHOTO Orbit Advanced Techn…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~73 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Orbit Advanced Technologies, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Hampshire employers → · Look up another →

QA Technology Company, Inc. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QA Technology Company, Inc. averages 3.2 TCR (98% of the Integrated-circuit testers manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QA Technology Company, Inc. TCR series: 2017=5.7 · 2018=4.3 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=1.5 · 2021=1.5 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=2.8 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.3

Where QA Technology Company, Inc. falls in its industry

125 Integrated-circuit testers man establishments

Safer than 12% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Hampshire alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 7 Integrated-circuit testers man employers in New Hampshire.

QA Technology Company, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate QA Technology Company, Inc.
QA Technology Company, Inc. (73 employees, TCR 3.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

QA Technology Company, Inc. has fewer employees than the Integrated-circuit testers manufacturing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 2 0 0
2023 2.8 1.4 2 0 0
2022 4.3 1.4 3 0 0
2021 1.5 0.0 1 0 0
2020 1.5 1.5 1 0 0
2019 2.8 2.8 2 0 0
2018 4.3 2.9 3 0 0
2017 5.7 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · NH · Hampton

125 Integrated-circuit testers manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 2,718 rated employers in New Hampshire with headcount on file · 29 employers in Hampton, NH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Orbit Advanced Technologies, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way 3.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR JEM America Corp. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR HI-Honolulu 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bascom Maple Farms Inc 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fairway Electric Inc 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Erickson Construction 73 FTE
STATE-SIZE Integra-Biosciences Friars 73 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foss Performance Materials LLC 389 FTE
CITY-NEAR Foss Performance Materials Hampton Plant 310 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unitil Service Corp. 207 FTE
CITY-NEAR 08319 - Store # 8319 Hampton 148 FTE
NAT-TCR Eugene, OR 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Keefe Group Syracuse / Liverpool 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Clay County - Highway 3.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Romac Electronics Inc 3.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Schwarz Paving Company Inc 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mid Valley Recycling, LLC 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Feralloy Southern Division, Loc'n 328 73 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wildwood Express, Inc. 73 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.