Digital panel meters, electricity measuring, manufacturing · Washington

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way

Everett, WA · ~256 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.3
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Digital panel meters, electricity measuring, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way: 3.3 TCR = 101% of Digital panel meters, electricity measuring, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way safety composite

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 6%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

19/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 3.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.6

2019→2021

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way injury rate improved

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way's TCR fell 0.6 from 4.2 in 2019 to 3.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2019 at 4.2 TCR. In 2021, DART was 1.07× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=4.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 334515 · Everett, WA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.3 · 101% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #4/5
  • PHOTO JEM America Corp.
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 23 inj
  • SIZE ~256 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: JEM America Corp. (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Washington employers → · Look up another →

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way averages 3.3 TCR (101% of the Digital panel meters, electricity measuring, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way TCR series: 2019=4.2 · 2020=2.3 · 2021=3.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way falls in its industry

125 Digital panel meters, electric establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 0.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Washington alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 5 Digital panel meters, electric employers in Washington.

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way (256 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way
Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way (256 employees, TCR 3.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 86 employees and a TCR of 0.9

Fluke Electronics- Evergreen Way has more employees than the Digital panel meters, electricity measur median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 0.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 3.6 3.6 9 0 0
2020 2.3 1.5 6 0 0
2019 4.2 3.1 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

334515 · WA · Everett

125 Digital panel meters, electricity measuring, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,147 rated employers in Washington with headcount on file · 271 employers in Everett, WA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR JEM America Corp. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orbit Advanced Technologies, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR QA Technology Company, Inc. 3.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR HI-Honolulu 3.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Starbucks 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCL Seattle 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Pacific Medical Center 256 FTE
STATE-SIZE Public Hospital District #4 King County (DBA Snoqualmie Valley Hospital) 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA004 31,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR WA660 EVERETT MEDICAL CTR COLBY-EVERETT HR 3,160 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County Government 3,004 FTE
CITY-NEAR Snohomish County 2,851 FTE
NAT-TCR The Westin Jekyll Island 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bella Vista Healthcare LLC 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NurseCore of Syracuse 3.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Bed Bath and Beyond Bangor 3.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Meijer #52 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nucor Steel Birmingham, Inc. 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foster Care 256 FTE
NAT-SIZE Johnson and Johnson Consumer Lancaster 256 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.