Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale · Georgia

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood

Ellenwood, GA · ~213 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
4.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood runs at 300% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale workplace, earning a grade F.

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood: 12.3 TCR = 300% of Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS 4.1 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood safety composite

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood: 6.7 → 12.3 TCR

Peak year 2021 @ 18.1 TCR · DART/TCR 0.75× in 2023

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood's TCR rose 5.6 from 6.7 in 2017 to 12.3 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2021 at 18.1 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.75× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311991 · Ellenwood, GA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 300% of ind

  • DART 9.3 DART
  • RANK #15/16
  • PHOTO CFS NorCal - Hayward
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 118 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: CFS NorCal - Hayward (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows QT Kitchens - Ellenwood averages 12.3 TCR (300% of the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood TCR series: 2017=6.7 · 2018=7.7 · 2020=14.6 · 2021=18.1 · 2022=14.4 · 2023=12.3 · BLS 4.1

Where QT Kitchens - Ellenwood falls in its industry

376 Food, prepared, perishable, pa establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 16 Food, prepared, perishable, pa employers in Georgia.

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood (213 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate QT Kitchens - Ellenwood
QT Kitchens - Ellenwood (213 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 179 employees and a TCR of 5.1

QT Kitchens - Ellenwood has more employees than the Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.3 9.3 20 0 0
2022 14.4 7.5 21 0 0
2021 18.1 11.7 24 4 0
2020 14.6 7.3 22 2 0
2018 7.7 6.7 16 0 0
2017 6.7 5.4 15 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311991 · GA · Ellenwood

376 Food, prepared, perishable, packaged for individual resale employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 51 employers in Ellenwood, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR CFS NorCal - Hayward 12.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Market of Choice Central Kitchen 12.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Kitchen 12.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 890 CENTRAL KITCHEN 12.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BMEI - Villa Rica 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tufting 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tucker Door and Trim Monroe 213 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bagcraft - Norcross 213 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-ATLA 1,207 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6458-SANC 802 FTE
CITY-NEAR 303 711 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5303 682 FTE
NAT-TCR Perfection Industrial Finishing 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Greater Des Moines Habitat for Humanity 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR NE Shaped Wire 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Kimpton Hotel Palomar Westwood 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Evergreen Packaging - Waynesville 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Germantown-Airgas Safety 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clinics of North Texas 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mitchell-Hollingsworth Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.