Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Colorado

Quality Irrigation - Yuma

Yuma, CO · ~31 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.6
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Quality Irrigation - Yuma runs at 360% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Quality Irrigation - Yuma: 7.6 TCR = 360% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Quality Irrigation - Yuma safety composite

Quality Irrigation - Yuma scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.29 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.8

2016→2024

Quality Irrigation - Yuma injury rate improved

Quality Irrigation - Yuma's TCR fell 2.8 from 8.1 in 2016 to 5.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.7× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.1 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=6.0 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=5.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Yuma, CO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.6 · 360% of ind

  • DART 5.3 DART
  • RANK #43/46
  • PHOTO Marion-05
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Marion-05 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

Quality Irrigation - Yuma in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Quality Irrigation - Yuma averages 7.6 TCR (360% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Quality Irrigation - Yuma TCR series: 2016=8.1 · 2017=8 · 2018=10.3 · 2019=12.3 · 2020=6.4 · 2021=9.2 · 2022=6 · 2023=2.5 · 2024=5.3 · BLS 2.1

Where Quality Irrigation - Yuma falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #43 safest of 46 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Colorado.

Quality Irrigation - Yuma (31 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Quality Irrigation - Yuma
Quality Irrigation - Yuma (31 employees, TCR 7.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Quality Irrigation - Yuma has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.3 5.3 2 0 0
2023 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2022 6.0 3.0 1 1 0
2021 9.2 9.2 3 0 0
2020 6.4 6.4 2 0 0
2019 12.3 9.2 3 1 0
2018 10.3 10.3 3 0 0
2017 8.0 8.0 3 0 0
2016 8.1 8.1 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · CO · Yuma

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 7 employers in Yuma, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Marion-05 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR RPM & Associates, Inc. 7.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Mid-Atlantic : SVC-Wilkes-Barre PA-USA 7.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Empire Truck Sales - Mossy Head 7.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Strad USA Inc. 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heorot Power Management, LLC 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE San Isabel Electric Association-Pueblo West E&O 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brighton Service Center-275 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Feedlot 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Life Care Center 30 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma CO 28 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yuma Ethanol 27 FTE
NAT-TCR Nevada Surgical Services 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Peco Foods Inc-Live Haul 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Ebony Lake Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 7.6 TCR
NAT-TCR 1706 Lkq 7.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE WAVE Benton Harbor 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wheeler Tank Manufacturing, Inc. 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE L&P Painting Shop & Office 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Ford Sawmills Inc 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.