Processed meats manufacturing · Nebraska
Quality Processing Services Omaha
Omaha, NE · ~47 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 25.7
- Avg TCR
- 3.3
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Quality Processing Services Omaha runs at 778% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Processed meats manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 25.7
- avg TCR · per 100 workers
- 3.3
- industry benchmark (BLS)
- 28
- recordable injuries tracked
Grade compares Quality Processing Services Omaha's OSHA Total Case Rate of 25.7 to the Processed meats manufacturing BLS benchmark of 3.3 (778% of benchmark) across 2 years of Form 300A filings (2016–2024). <a href="/methodology">See methodology</a> for reporting-limitation caveats.
Injury rate over time
Quality Processing Services Omaha's yearly Total Case Rate, against the 3.3 industry benchmark.
Where Quality Processing Services Omaha falls in its industry
631 Processed meats manufacturing establishmentsSafer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.
Narrower to Nebraska alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #29 safest of 29 Processed meats manufacturing employers in Nebraska.
Verify This Employer with OSHA
The 28 injuries shown on this page for Quality Processing Services Omaha are sourced from its own 2 years of mandatory OSHA Form 300A summaries. Cross-check the underlying establishment record directly against the federal source, name, NAICS classification, recordable case totals, and inspection history are all searchable on OSHA's Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data system.
Verify on OSHA Establishment SearchSource: U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Establishment-Specific Injury and Illness Data. NAICS 311612 - Processed meats manufacturing.
DART Rate, Transparent Calculation (2017)
What is the DART rate formula?
DART (Days Away, Restricted, or Transferred) is computed by OSHA as incidents × 200,000 ÷ hours worked. The 200,000-hour denominator equals roughly 100 full-time workers, which lets establishments of very different sizes be compared directly.
2 DART incidents × 200,000 ÷ 108,976 hours worked = 3.67 DART
Methodology: 29 CFR 1904, OSHA Form 300A recordkeeping
Cross-Validating Context, Establishment vs Industry vs State
| Benchmark | TCR | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Quality Processing Services Omaha (this establishment) | 25.69 | OSHA ITA Form 300A, 2-year avg |
| Meats, fresh or chilled (except poultry and small game), frozen, made from purchased carcasses industry avg | 3.30 | BLS IIF, NAICS 311612 |
| Nebraska state avg (all industries) | 4.84 | OSHA ITA, state-level rollup |
Industry benchmarks: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Injuries, Illnesses, and Fatalities (IIF) program
Reportable Incident Timeline
Year-by-year reportable incidents (recordable injuries + illnesses + fatalities) submitted by Quality Processing Services Omaha to OSHA's Injury Tracking Application. Each row anchors to OSHA's inspection records search where you can pull the underlying inspection case numbers and citations for that establishment-year.
- 2017: 14 reportable incidents · 14 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
- 2016: 14 reportable incidents · 14 injuries, 0 illnesses, 0 fatalities - OSHA inspection records (case numbers)
Source: OSHA Inspection Information System (IMIS) - inspection case-number records
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 25.7 | 3.7 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 60.0 | 0.0 | 14 | 0 | 0 |
What this grade means for you
Use this grade as a relative read on Quality Processing Services Omaha's reported OSHA injury record versus its Processed meats manufacturing peers, not a verdict on whether any single site is safe today.
- At 778% of the Processed meats manufacturing benchmark, Quality Processing Services Omaha reports more injuries than typical peers, ask specifically how the employer is reducing them. Know your rights
- Judge this record against the wider Processed meats manufacturing sector, where injury rates vary widely, before comparing it in isolation. See the industry
- Grades reflect 2016–2024 filings; check the latest establishment record straight from OSHA, or look up a different employer. Look up another
Safety grades reflect employers' self-reported OSHA Form 300A filings from 2016 to 2024 and can lag current conditions. A grade is not a guarantee that any specific workplace is safe or unsafe today. See our methodology and disclaimer.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is Quality Processing Services Omaha's safety grade?
How many injuries has Quality Processing Services Omaha reported?
Similar Employers
Matched by safety record across the industry, by workforce size within Nebraska, and by nearby establishments in Omaha - a different peer set than the category browse links below.
Similar TCR (~25.7)
Similar size (~47 workers)
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Every figure and grade on PlainSafetyScore is computed directly from OSHA's published Injury Tracking Application data and BLS industry benchmarks, no number is typed in by an editor. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these safety grades, or report a data error. Data current as of 2016-2024 OSHA ITA release.