Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans · Pennsylvania

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6

Reading, PA · ~54 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.7
Avg TCR
4.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 runs at 183% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans workplace, earning a grade D.

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6: 7.7 TCR = 183% of Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans BLS 4.2 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 safety composite

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6: 0.0 → 22.0 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 22.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2022

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6's TCR rose 22.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 22.0 in 2022. In 2022, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311351 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.7 · 183% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #23/23
  • PHOTO Seroogy's Chocolates
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 13 inj
  • SIZE ~54 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Seroogy's Chocolates (0.4 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 averages 7.7 TCR (183% of the Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=4.8 · 2018=10.1 · 2019=0 · 2021=9.3 · 2022=22 · BLS 4.2

Where R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 falls in its industry

65 Chocolate, confectionery, made establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 23 Chocolate, confectionery, made employers in Pennsylvania.

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 (54 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 178 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6
R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 (54 employees, TCR 7.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 178 employees and a TCR of 3.5

R. M. Palmer Company - Building #6 has fewer employees than the Chocolate, confectionery, made from caca median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 22.0 11.0 4 0 0
2021 9.3 4.7 0 4 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 10.1 8.4 6 0 0
2017 4.8 4.8 3 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311351 · PA · Reading

65 Chocolate, confectionery, made from cacao beans employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Seroogy's Chocolates 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mona Lisa Food products/Barry Callebaut USA 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cargill Cocoa & Chocolate, Inc 7.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building 3 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE TRIPLE-M-FARMS 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Scrubgrass Reclamation Company L.P. 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE 269-NiSource-Washington PA-Service 54 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wagman Construction Inc. 54 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Dick Campbell Company, Inc. 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eastern Mechanical Services Inc - Only Branch 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Sea Life Park Hawaii 7.7 TCR
NAT-TCR S03752 - WM - Laramie 7.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Extreme Steel Crane & Rigging, Inc 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Children's Hospital Colorado - Printer's Park Medical Plaza 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE College Muscle Movers 54 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conowingo 54 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2021, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.