Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Connecticut

R & R Corrugated Container Inc

Bristol, CT · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R & R Corrugated Container Inc runs at 158% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade D.

R & R Corrugated Container Inc: 5.2 TCR = 158% of Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R & R Corrugated Container Inc safety composite

R & R Corrugated Container Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 14%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.2 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 3.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.8

2022→2023

R & R Corrugated Container Inc injury rate improved

R & R Corrugated Container Inc's TCR fell 0.8 from 5.6 in 2022 to 4.8 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 5.6 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.62× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=5.6 · 2023=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322211 · Bristol, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.2 · 158% of ind

  • DART 3.2 DART
  • RANK #8/12
  • PHOTO Alliance Packaging, …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Alliance Packaging, LLC Hillsboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

R & R Corrugated Container Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R & R Corrugated Container Inc averages 5.2 TCR (158% of the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R & R Corrugated Container Inc TCR series: 2022=5.6 · 2023=4.8 · BLS 3.3

Where R & R Corrugated Container Inc falls in its industry

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 12 Boxes, corrugated and solid fi employers in Connecticut.

R & R Corrugated Container Inc (67 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0246 Average employees Total Case Rate R & R Corrugated Container Inc
R & R Corrugated Container Inc (67 employees, TCR 5.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 102 employees and a TCR of 2.4

R & R Corrugated Container Inc has fewer employees than the Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.8 3.2 3 0 0
2022 5.6 1.9 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322211 · CT · Bristol

1,338 Boxes, corrugated and solid fiber, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 95 employers in Bristol, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Alliance Packaging, LLC Hillsboro 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Anchor Bay Packaging Corporation - Plant 1 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Packaging, LLC- Glendale Heights 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SupplyOne Oklahoma City, Inc. - Retail 5.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Frank Capasso and Sons, Inc 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE D/E/F Services Group, Ltd. Main Office 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Eastford-CT - 224 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Shepard Steel Co., Inc. - Hartford 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR ESPN Bristol Campus 3,688 FTE
CITY-NEAR ESPN Headquarters 3,607 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Public Schoold 1,432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bristol Hospital 1,370 FTE
NAT-TCR 10-75 Emergency Vehicles, LLC 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation - Jessup 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Wonton Food Inc New York Noodle 5.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1637 5.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Nashville Ready Mix - Shop 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE First Florida Constructors, LLC-Miami 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Olean Manor Inc 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alfa Laval Inc. Houston (loc code: TXHOUS) 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.