Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Connecticut

The Residence at Ferry Park

Rocky Hill, CT · ~67 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
30.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Ferry Park runs at 801% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Ferry Park: 30.4 TCR = 801% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Ferry Park safety composite

The Residence at Ferry Park scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 30.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Residence at Ferry Park: 30.0 → 30.9 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 30.9 TCR · DART/TCR 0.36× in 2024

The Residence at Ferry Park's TCR rose 0.9 from 30.0 in 2023 to 30.9 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rocky Hill, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 30.4 · 801% of ind

  • DART 11.0 DART
  • RANK #100/100
  • PHOTO Carlton Senior Livin…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 22 inj
  • SIZE ~67 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Carlton Senior Living Davis (0.5 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Ferry Park in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Ferry Park averages 30.4 TCR (801% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-09-26

The Residence at Ferry Park TCR series: 2023=30 · 2024=30.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Ferry Park falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Connecticut.

The Residence at Ferry Park (67 employees, TCR 30.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 010203040 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Ferry Park
The Residence at Ferry Park (67 employees, TCR 30.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Residence at Ferry Park has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 30.9 11.0 13 1 0
2023 30.0 17.5 9 3 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CT · Rocky Hill

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 87 employers in Rocky Hill, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Carlton Senior Living Davis 29.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Residence of Fosston 29.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Rose Valley Scappoose 29.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Chandler Place Independent Living 29.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Town of Hamden - Parks and Recreation 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE 100 Prospect Street Naugatuck, CT, 06770 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE Westbrook Fire Department 67 FTE
STATE-SIZE STARR Logistics, LLC 67 FTE
CITY-NEAR Point32Health Rocky Hill 4,440 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henkel Way 549 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sysco Foods CT 323 FTE
CITY-NEAR SecureCare Options dba 60 West 317 FTE
NAT-TCR 048 Juvenile Detention Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Governor Juan F. Luis Hospital and Medical Center 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rockland Facility 30.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kemper Moving Systems 30.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE BATHMASTERS 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE DZ Block Inc. 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sodexo at Hca Valley Regional 67 FTE
NAT-SIZE Interplex Etch Logic 67 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.