Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Connecticut

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls

Windsor, CT · ~110 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls runs at 61% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls: 2.0 TCR = 61% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls safety composite

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

40/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.04 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls: 1.0 → 3.0 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 3.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.02× in 2023

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls's TCR rose 2.1 from 1.0 in 2022 to 3.0 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Windsor, CT AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 61% of ind

  • DART 2.0 DART
  • RANK #15/36
  • PHOTO Radius Aerospace Inc…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls averages 2.0 TCR (61% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls TCR series: 2022=1 · 2023=3 · BLS 3.3

Where TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 36 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Connecticut.

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls (110 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls
TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls (110 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

TRIUMPH Systems, Electronics, and Controls has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.0 2.0 3 0 0
2022 1.0 1.0 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CT · Windsor

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 151 employers in Windsor, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Radius Aerospace Inc. Hot Springs 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Northstar Aerospace (Phoenix) 401 Building 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR UT011 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR GKN Aerospace South Carolina Inc 2.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Division #24 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lyman Products 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bausch Advanced Tech 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE New England Airfoil Products 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR CT-03 4,124 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL2 3,131 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - BDL4 2,628 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : BDL2 2,395 FTE
NAT-TCR Mebane Lumber Building Supply 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rustoleum Brooklyn Park 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Creative Masonry, Inc. 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Dultmeier Sales-Omaha 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE St Ann's Care Center 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Open Loop Energy 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMEA 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE SMP Health- St. Kateri 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.