Family restaurants, limited-service · Minnesota

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673

Lakeville, MN · ~71 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 runs at 160% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Family restaurants, limited-service workplace, earning a grade D.

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673: 4.8 TCR = 160% of Family restaurants, limited-service BLS 3.0 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 safety composite

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 50% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.9

2022→2024

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 injury rate improved

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673's TCR fell 8.9 from 11.6 in 2022 to 2.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 11.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=11.6 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 722513 · Lakeville, MN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 160% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #63/98
  • PHOTO Baker's Drive-Thru -…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~71 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Baker's Drive-Thru - 165 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 averages 4.8 TCR (160% of the Family restaurants, limited-service BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 TCR series: 2022=11.6 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.8 · BLS 3.0

Where Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 falls in its industry

1,014 Family restaurants, limited-se establishments

Safer than 50% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 98 Family restaurants, limited-se employers in Minnesota.

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 (71 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673
Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 (71 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 34 employees and a TCR of 4.8

Raising Cane's Chicken Fingers C673 has more employees than the Family restaurants, limited-service median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.8 0.0 1 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 11.6 7.8 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

722513 · MN · Lakeville

1,014 Family restaurants, limited-service employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 141 employers in Lakeville, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Baker's Drive-Thru - 165 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR VITALIGENT LLC Pleasant Hill 156 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Meson Sandwiches 032 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR N. Grants Pass Burger King 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fagen, Inc. 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rochester Office 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Donlar Construction Company 71 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hanson Silo Company 71 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeville Technical Center 645 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schmitty & Sons 640 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hearthside Foods Solutions 634 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1484 - Lakeville 414 FTE
NAT-TCR Allure Labs, Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR 3258 - East Orange 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Oregon Health Investors Inc. 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Marshall 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Caraustar Industrial and Consumer Products Group 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE KRS Holdings Inc 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE GSE Construction Mountain Division 71 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wildcat Renovation LLC 71 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.