Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction · California
Ranger Pipelines Inc
San Francisco, CA · ~145 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- C
- Average Safety Record
- 2.8
- Avg TCR
- 2.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
Ranger Pipelines Inc runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction workplace, earning a grade C.
Ranger Pipelines Inc: 2.8 TCR = 98% of Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS 2.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)
Ranger Pipelines Inc safety composite
Ranger Pipelines Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
39/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- D 2.75 per 100 workers
Safer than 53% of industry peers
- DART rate
- F 4.74 per 100 workers
Safer than 15% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 52% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
Rising injury rate
Ranger Pipelines Inc: 2.2 → 4.7 TCR
Peak year 2022 @ 4.9 TCR · DART/TCR 1.72× in 2024
Ranger Pipelines Inc's TCR rose 2.5 from 2.2 in 2017 to 4.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 4.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 237110 · San Francisco, CA AT/BELOW-IND · MID
Grade C · TCR 2.8 · 98% of ind
- DART 4.7 DART
- RANK #95/201
- PHOTO Juarez contracting
- BOOK 8y book
- INJ 29 inj
- SIZE ~145 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Juarez contracting (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
Ranger Pipelines Inc in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
Ranger Pipelines Inc
2.8 TCR
- Juarez contrac
Juarez contracting
2.8 TCR
- Azar Services
Azar Services LLC
2.8 TCR
- TALUS CONSTRUC
TALUS CONSTRUCTION, INC
2.8 TCR
- State Utility
State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe
2.8 TCR
What this shows Ranger Pipelines Inc averages 2.8 TCR (98% of the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction BLS benchmark).
Ranger Pipelines Inc TCR series: 2017=2.2 · 2018=0.8 · 2019=1.4 · 2020=4.2 · 2021=0.9 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=4.7 · BLS 2.8
Where Ranger Pipelines Inc falls in its industry
1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat establishmentsSafer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #95 safest of 201 Utility line (i.e., sewer, wat employers in California.
Ranger Pipelines Inc has more employees than the Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), const median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 4.9 | 4.1 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
237110 · CA · San Francisco
1,614 Utility line (i.e., sewer, water), construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 1,144 employers in San Francisco, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Juarez contracting | 2.8 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Azar Services LLC | 2.8 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | TALUS CONSTRUCTION, INC | 2.8 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | State Utility Contractors, Inc. Monroe | 2.8 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | CADY - 02 | 145 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | R&T Farm Management, Inc. | 145 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Ocean Mist Farms - Castroville | 145 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | SANTA ROSA OFFICES | 145 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | UC San Francisco | 18,070 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | DoorDash, Inc. | 12,430 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | UC San Francisco Health | 12,262 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | SFO - Airport United Airlines Offices | 11,622 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | STERIS - Distribution Center | 2.8 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Trulieve Higdon Main | 2.8 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Fabio Inc. | 2.8 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Madico, Inc | 2.8 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | General Service Department | 145 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Murfreesboro Distribution Center | 145 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Maplewood at Newtown | 145 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Auburn Plant | 145 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.