Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) · New York

Ravenswood Generating Station

Long Island City, NY · ~148 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Ravenswood Generating Station runs at 198% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) workplace, earning a grade D.

Ravenswood Generating Station: 2.4 TCR = 198% of Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS 1.2 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Ravenswood Generating Station safety composite

Ravenswood Generating Station scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 29%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 2.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 0.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 33% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.2

2016→2024

Ravenswood Generating Station injury rate improved

Ravenswood Generating Station's TCR fell 4.2 from 5.9 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 5.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=5.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221112 · Long Island City, NY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 2.4 · 198% of ind

  • DART 0.9 DART
  • RANK #19/29
  • PHOTO OG&E-Seminole PP; EG…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: OG&E-Seminole PP; EGX Gath/Trans (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

Ravenswood Generating Station in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Ravenswood Generating Station averages 2.4 TCR (198% of the Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Ravenswood Generating Station TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=4.9 · 2018=5 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2022=0.7 · 2023=0.8 · 2024=1.7 · BLS 1.2

Where Ravenswood Generating Station falls in its industry

846 Electric power generation, fos establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #19 safest of 29 Electric power generation, fos employers in New York.

Ravenswood Generating Station (148 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Ravenswood Generating Station
Ravenswood Generating Station (148 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 59 employees and a TCR of 1.5

Ravenswood Generating Station has more employees than the Electric power generation, fossil fuel ( median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 1.7 0.9 2 0 0
2023 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2022 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 2 0 0
2018 5.0 4.4 7 1 0
2017 4.9 4.3 8 0 0
2016 5.9 3.7 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221112 · NY · Long Island City

846 Electric power generation, fossil fuel (e.g., coal, oil, gas) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 160 employers in Long Island City, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR OG&E-Seminole PP; EGX Gath/Trans 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carty 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Elmroad Generating Station 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tolk/Plant X Station 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE LPCiminelli Inc 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Giaquinto Masonry 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mason Technologies Inc 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Binghamton Container 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR Collins Building Services 3,480 FTE
CITY-NEAR Long Island City Facility 2,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR New York City Department of Design & Construction 1,034 FTE
CITY-NEAR E-J Electric Installation Co. 1,006 FTE
NAT-TCR Good's Store Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Plant 22 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR American Plastic Products, Inc. 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sullivan Save-A-Lot 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE PHL Gunton Corporation 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Caddock Electronics, Inc. 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oxford Location (Main) 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wayne Smith Trucking 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.