Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction · California

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA

Fort Irwin, CA · ~72 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.4
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA runs at 15% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction workplace, earning a grade A.

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA: 0.4 TCR = 15% of Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction BLS 2.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA safety composite

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 0.41 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2017→2019

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA injury rate improved

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA's TCR fell 1.2 from 1.2 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.2 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.2 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238990 · Fort Irwin, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 0.4 · 15% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #6/171
  • PHOTO AXIOS Augusta
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~72 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: AXIOS Augusta (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA averages 0.4 TCR (15% of the Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA TCR series: 2017=1.2 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA falls in its industry

1,634 Cleaning building interiors du establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 171 Cleaning building interiors du employers in California.

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA (72 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA
Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA (72 employees, TCR 0.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 52 employees and a TCR of 1.9

Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA has more employees than the Cleaning building interiors during and i median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238990 · CA · Fort Irwin

1,634 Cleaning building interiors during and immediately after construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Fort Irwin, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR AXIOS Augusta 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bengal Crane and Rigging, LLC 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR BrandSafway, LLC - Diamond Thermal Branch - Sutton 0.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR KM Industrial, Inc. 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Monterey Pacific, LLC 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Arts Ranch 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mellano & Company - Los Angeles Wholesale House 72 FTE
STATE-SIZE Greg Hooker dba Diamond H Dairy 72 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - NTC Ft Irwin 638 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Dessert Support Services 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Dessert Support Services JV Bridge Ft. Irwin CP 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI 35 FTE
NAT-TCR Comm HVAC NA and EMEA : SVC-Alabama/Georgia District : SVC-Birmingham AL-USA 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hilldrup Companies - Stafford 164-55 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Otis Elevator Company-Knoxville 0.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Corporate Offices 0.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Troy #010 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Eversource - Bow 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Designers Choice Stainless 72 FTE
NAT-SIZE Trader Joe's 0648 Gaithersburg 72 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.