Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system · California

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI

Fort Irwin, CA · ~35 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
1.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system workplace, earning a grade C.

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS 1.2 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI safety composite

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

81/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 80% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI held a steady TCR band

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2018 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 0.0 TCR.

2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 221320 · Fort Irwin, CA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/74
  • PHOTO Grandway West Office
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~35 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Grandway West Office (0.1 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI TCR series: 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=0 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 1.2

Where Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI falls in its industry

400 Collection, treatment, and dis establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 74 Collection, treatment, and dis employers in California.

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI (35 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI
Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI (35 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 47 employees and a TCR of 4.4

Jacobs - FORT IRWIN - OMI has fewer employees than the Collection, treatment, and disposal of w median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

221320 · CA · Fort Irwin

400 Collection, treatment, and disposal of waste through a sewer system employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 6 employers in Fort Irwin, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Grandway West Office 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office Building Annex 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Main Office Building Annex (MOBA) 0.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Jacobs - CENTENNIAL - OMI 0.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE CONSTRUCTION FABRICATION/CARPENTRY/PAINTING/ELECTRIC/PIPE 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Meek Ranches LLC 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Dresick Farms, Inc. - Farm 35 FTE
STATE-SIZE Wolfsen Inc 35 FTE
CITY-NEAR DI - NTC Ft Irwin 638 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Dessert Support Services 184 FTE
CITY-NEAR High Dessert Support Services JV Bridge Ft. Irwin CP 168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Raytheon_Fort Irwin_CA 72 FTE
NAT-TCR Cedar Bay Entertainment LLC 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Cardinal Health 7000 and 7200 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR One Federal Street 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Rogers Group, Inc 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Molly Maid of Greater Clear Lake 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE Concord Store 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE SC Voc Rehab Palmetto Center 35 FTE
NAT-SIZE SC Voc Rehab Anderson 35 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.