Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing · Connecticut

R&D Dynamics Corporation

Bloomfield, CT · ~75 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.6
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

R&D Dynamics Corporation runs at 78% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

R&D Dynamics Corporation: 2.6 TCR = 78% of Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

R&D Dynamics Corporation safety composite

R&D Dynamics Corporation scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 34%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 2.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.17 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2022→2023

R&D Dynamics Corporation injury rate improved

R&D Dynamics Corporation's TCR fell 0.5 from 2.8 in 2022 to 2.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 2.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.45× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=2.8 · 2023=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 336413 · Bloomfield, CT AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.6 · 78% of ind

  • DART 1.2 DART
  • RANK #20/36
  • PHOTO Magellan Aerospace
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~75 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Magellan Aerospace (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

R&D Dynamics Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows R&D Dynamics Corporation averages 2.6 TCR (78% of the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

R&D Dynamics Corporation TCR series: 2022=2.8 · 2023=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where R&D Dynamics Corporation falls in its industry

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #20 safest of 36 Aircraft assemblies, subassemb employers in Connecticut.

R&D Dynamics Corporation (75 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate R&D Dynamics Corporation
R&D Dynamics Corporation (75 employees, TCR 2.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 130 employees and a TCR of 1.9

R&D Dynamics Corporation has fewer employees than the Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2022 2.8 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

336413 · CT · Bloomfield

650 Aircraft assemblies, subassemblies, and parts (except engines) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 107 employers in Bloomfield, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Magellan Aerospace 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pioneer Industries Plant 1 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR MACRO - Discovery Drive 2.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Triumph Group Precision Components 2.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Downes Construction Company 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aerial Electric 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yankee Sheet Metal 75 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-East Hartford 75 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bloomfield HomeGoods DC 1,333 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.G. Conn. Merchants,LLC 1,168 FTE
CITY-NEAR Otis Elevator Company-Otis Service Center 532 FTE
CITY-NEAR Kamatics Corporation 505 FTE
NAT-TCR Diamond Parking - Corporate Office Location 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Charlotte-Facility Servic - 205 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR River Crossing of St. Charles 2.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cenveo Worldwide Limited Indianapolis 2.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ark Fabricators 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Preferred 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Aperion Care Princeton 75 FTE
NAT-SIZE Best Roofing Services, LLC Miami 75 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.