Telephone line construction · North Dakota

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications

Abercrombie, ND · ~31 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Telephone line construction workplace, earning a grade C.

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Telephone line construction BLS 2.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications safety composite

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

80/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications held a steady TCR band

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237130 · Abercrombie, ND AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/9
  • PHOTO 15-100 IN
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~31 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 15-100 IN (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Dakota employers → · Look up another →

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Telephone line construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications falls in its industry

1,605 Telephone line construction establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Dakota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 9 Telephone line construction employers in North Dakota.

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications (31 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications
Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications (31 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 74 employees and a TCR of 2.0

Red River Rural Telephone Association; DBA Red River Communications has fewer employees than the Telephone line construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237130 · ND · Abercrombie

1,605 Telephone line construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,696 rated employers in North Dakota with headcount on file · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 15-100 IN 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Hanwha Q Cells USA Corp. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 105185 - IPP Repowering- 840MW 2x2x1 CC 0.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR 103171 - Huntington Beach Energy Project 0.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Continental Resources - Watford City, ND 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Dakota Operations Center 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE CCI - Construction Sites 31 FTE
STATE-SIZE BECHTOLD PAVING INC 31 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northland Truss Systems - Aber 34 FTE
NAT-TCR Atlanta - Phipps 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Meijer 208 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Binghamton 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Detroit 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE York Currogated Container Corp 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Wimsatt Building Materials - Sterling Heights 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Medford Moulding Company 31 FTE
NAT-SIZE Santanna Banana Co Inc 31 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.