Grocery stores · Pennsylvania

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg

Reading, PA · ~113 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.5
Avg TCR
3.4
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg runs at 131% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Grocery stores workplace, earning a grade D.

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg: 4.5 TCR = 131% of Grocery stores BLS 3.4 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg safety composite

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 39%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.57 per 100 workers

Safer than 39% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.3

2016→2024

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg injury rate improved

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg's TCR fell 2.3 from 5.9 in 2016 to 3.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.8× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 445110 · Reading, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.5 · 131% of ind

  • DART 3.6 DART
  • RANK #569/1287
  • PHOTO Shop Rite of Springf…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Shop Rite of Springfield (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg averages 4.5 TCR (131% of the Grocery stores BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg TCR series: 2016=5.9 · 2017=1.2 · 2018=5.8 · 2019=7.1 · 2020=3.3 · 2021=2.4 · 2022=7.4 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=3.6 · BLS 3.4

Where Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg falls in its industry

30,654 Grocery stores establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #569 safest of 1287 Grocery stores employers in Pennsylvania.

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg (113 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg
Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg (113 employees, TCR 4.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 99 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg has more employees than the Grocery stores median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2023 3.6 3.6 3 0 0
2022 7.4 6.1 6 0 0
2021 2.4 1.2 2 0 0
2020 3.3 3.3 3 0 0
2019 7.1 3.5 6 0 0
2018 5.8 4.7 5 0 0
2017 1.2 1.2 1 0 0
2016 5.9 4.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

445110 · PA · Reading

30,654 Grocery stores employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 303 employers in Reading, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Shop Rite of Springfield 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Piggly Wiggly 184 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 1141 4.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Store 1622 4.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Constellation Power Labs 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Hain Celestial Group. South Tree 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE FARMER BOY AG INC 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Conway Phillips Holding, LLC 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR READING HOSPITAL 5,693 FTE
CITY-NEAR SAO : Reading 2,203 FTE
CITY-NEAR A077 - Penn State Health St. Joseph Medical Center 1,764 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - TEN1 1,261 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Montana Medical Center 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Monical's Pizza Paris 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hull Facility - AGROPUR 4.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Memorial Hermann Cypress Hospital 4.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Scott County Park 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pike Louisiana Statewide Operations 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Heights of Tyler 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anamet Electrical, Inc 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.