Conduits and fittings, electrical, manufacturing · Illinois

Anamet Electrical, Inc

Mattoon, IL · ~113 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Anamet Electrical, Inc runs at 495% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Conduits and fittings, electrical, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Anamet Electrical, Inc: 16.4 TCR = 495% of Conduits and fittings, electrical, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Anamet Electrical, Inc safety composite

Anamet Electrical, Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 0%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 0% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 6% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Anamet Electrical, Inc: 15.1 → 19.1 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 23.6 TCR · DART/TCR 0.56× in 2024

Anamet Electrical, Inc's TCR rose 4.0 from 15.1 in 2016 to 19.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 23.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 335932 · Mattoon, IL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.4 · 495% of ind

  • DART 9.1 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Nordic Fiberglass In…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 152 inj
  • SIZE ~113 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Nordic Fiberglass Inc. Warren MN (1.7 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

Anamet Electrical, Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Anamet Electrical, Inc averages 16.4 TCR (495% of the Conduits and fittings, electrical, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Anamet Electrical, Inc TCR series: 2016=15.1 · 2017=10.1 · 2018=20 · 2019=23.6 · 2020=8.8 · 2021=16.7 · 2022=17.2 · 2023=16.6 · 2024=19.1 · BLS 3.3

Where Anamet Electrical, Inc falls in its industry

71 Conduits and fittings, electri establishments

Safer than 0% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Conduits and fittings, electri employers in Illinois.

Anamet Electrical, Inc (113 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 2.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 02004006008001,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Anamet Electrical, Inc
Anamet Electrical, Inc (113 employees, TCR 16.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 110 employees and a TCR of 2.6

Anamet Electrical, Inc has more employees than the Conduits and fittings, electrical, manuf median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 19.1 9.1 21 0 0
2023 16.6 12.9 18 0 0
2022 17.2 12.4 18 0 0
2021 16.7 10.8 13 4 0
2020 8.8 5.9 9 0 0
2019 23.6 17.0 23 2 0
2018 20.0 8.2 22 0 0
2017 10.1 8.4 12 0 0
2016 15.1 10.7 16 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

335932 · IL · Mattoon

71 Conduits and fittings, electrical, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 66 employers in Mattoon, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Nordic Fiberglass Inc. Warren MN 14.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nordic Fiberglass, Inc. 11.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR NSI | Bridgeport Fittings 9.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Minerallac Company 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rock Island Service Building 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Four Rivers Sanitation Authority 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Graycor Construction Company Inc. 113 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bennett & Brosseau Roofing, Inc. 113 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sarah Bush Lincoln Health Center 2,821 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sarah Bush Lincoln Health System 2,352 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 481 342 FTE
CITY-NEAR 481 327 FTE
NAT-TCR Father Baker Manor 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0160 Sammamish 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel Grand Stark 16.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Oswegatchie Elementary 16.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Crown Lift Trucks Vandalia 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Heights of Tyler 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Lehigh Street 113 FTE
NAT-SIZE Redner's Warehouse Market Muhlenberg 113 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.