Distribution line, sewer and water, construction · Wisconsin

Reesman's Excavating and Grading

Burlington, WI · ~65 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reesman's Excavating and Grading runs at 133% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Distribution line, sewer and water, construction workplace, earning a grade D.

Reesman's Excavating and Grading: 3.7 TCR = 133% of Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS 2.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reesman's Excavating and Grading safety composite

Reesman's Excavating and Grading scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 40%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

57/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.2

2019→2024

Reesman's Excavating and Grading injury rate improved

Reesman's Excavating and Grading's TCR fell 3.2 from 3.2 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 10.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=3.2 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=10.6 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 237110 · Burlington, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 3.7 · 133% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #18/41
  • PHOTO Montana Construction…
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~65 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Montana Construction Corp Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Reesman's Excavating and Grading in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reesman's Excavating and Grading averages 3.7 TCR (133% of the Distribution line, sewer and water, construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reesman's Excavating and Grading TCR series: 2019=3.2 · 2020=2.8 · 2021=10.6 · 2022=4.3 · 2023=1.6 · 2024=0 · BLS 2.8

Where Reesman's Excavating and Grading falls in its industry

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and w establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #18 safest of 41 Distribution line, sewer and w employers in Wisconsin.

Reesman's Excavating and Grading (65 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Reesman's Excavating and Grading
Reesman's Excavating and Grading (65 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 54 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Reesman's Excavating and Grading has more employees than the Distribution line, sewer and water, cons median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 1.6 0.0 1 0 0
2022 4.3 0.0 3 0 0
2021 10.6 1.5 7 0 0
2020 2.8 1.4 1 1 0
2019 3.2 1.6 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

237110 · WI · Burlington

1,614 Distribution line, sewer and water, construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 53 employers in Burlington, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Montana Construction Corp Inc 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR DELMONT UTILITIES, INC. 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Delmarva Site Development 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spiniello Companies 3.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABS Global - Leeds 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE I E I GENERAL CONTRACTORS INC 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE The State Group Industrial USA Limited - Division 48 Wisconsin 65 FTE
STATE-SIZE Madison, WI 65 FTE
CITY-NEAR Aurora Memorial Hospital of Burlington 488 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle 452 FTE
CITY-NEAR Nestle - Burlington 404 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ardagh Glass Inc Burlington 377 FTE
NAT-TCR Pfanstiehl INC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Seneca Foods Corporation 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Dutch Valley Transportation, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Walterboro,SC - 211 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Eddie Gilstrap Motors 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 192 Kendall 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE 103 Jacksonville 65 FTE
NAT-SIZE Accura healthcare of Stanton 65 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.