Juices, fruit or vegetable, fresh, manufacturing · Minnesota

Seneca Foods Corporation

Montgomery, MN · ~275 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
1
Fatality
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Seneca Foods Corporation runs at 113% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Juices, fruit or vegetable, fresh, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Seneca Foods Corporation: 3.7 TCR = 113% of Juices, fruit or vegetable, fresh, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Seneca Foods Corporation safety composite

Seneca Foods Corporation scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

37/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.73 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

Fatalities
F 1

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Seneca Foods Corporation: 3.0 → 3.5 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 5.0 TCR · DART/TCR 0.76× in 2024

Seneca Foods Corporation's TCR rose 0.5 from 3.0 in 2016 to 3.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 5.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 311421 · Montgomery, MN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 113% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #2/11
  • PHOTO Summer Garden
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 113 inj
  • SIZE ~275 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Summer Garden (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Minnesota employers → · Look up another →

Seneca Foods Corporation in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Seneca Foods Corporation averages 3.7 TCR (113% of the Juices, fruit or vegetable, fresh, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Seneca Foods Corporation TCR series: 2016=3 · 2017=3.4 · 2018=3.5 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=4 · 2021=3 · 2022=3.6 · 2023=5 · 2024=3.5 · BLS 3.3

Where Seneca Foods Corporation falls in its industry

330 Juices, fruit or vegetable, fr establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.1.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Minnesota alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #2 safest of 11 Juices, fruit or vegetable, fr employers in Minnesota.

Seneca Foods Corporation (275 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 131 employees and a TCR of 4.1 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Seneca Foods Corporation
Seneca Foods Corporation (275 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 131 employees and a TCR of 4.1

Seneca Foods Corporation has more employees than the Juices, fruit or vegetable, fresh, manuf median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.1. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 3.5 2.8 11 0 0
2023 5.0 1.8 15 2 1
2022 3.6 1.4 13 0 0
2021 3.0 2.0 12 0 0
2020 4.0 2.1 15 0 0
2019 4.5 2.5 16 0 0
2018 3.5 1.8 12 0 0
2017 3.4 1.9 11 0 0
2016 3.0 1.5 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

311421 · MN · Montgomery

330 Juices, fruit or vegetable, fresh, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 15,828 rated employers in Minnesota with headcount on file · 7 employers in Montgomery, MN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Summer Garden 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Burnette Foods, Inc. New Era Facility 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Best Maid Products 3.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Knouse Foods - Peach Glen 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE 057-PL001 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Milaca Public School District #912 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE ELEMENTARY (100) 275 FTE
STATE-SIZE Duininck - MN 276 FTE
CITY-NEAR Montgomery K-8 99 FTE
CITY-NEAR MiTek USA 86 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tri-City United High School 70 FTE
CITY-NEAR Palmer Bus Service of Montgomery-Lonsdale, Inc. 65 FTE
NAT-TCR Dutch Valley Transportation, Inc. 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Walterboro,SC - 211 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Jit-Ex, LLC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Reesman's Excavating and Grading 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE THK Rhythm North America 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hayward Laboratories Inc. 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Mexico Oncology Hematology Consultants, Ltd.. 275 FTE
NAT-SIZE Life Care Center of Winter Haven 275 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.