Skilled nursing facilities · Iowa

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living

Norwalk, IA · ~85 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
15.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living runs at 234% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living: 15.2 TCR = 234% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living safety composite

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

24/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 15.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−31.2

2018→2021

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living injury rate improved

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living's TCR fell 31.2 from 39.7 in 2018 to 8.5 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 39.7 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=39.7 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=8.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Norwalk, IA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 15.2 · 234% of ind

  • DART 8.5 DART
  • RANK #353/396
  • PHOTO Azria Health Clarinda
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 20 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Azria Health Clarinda (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Iowa employers → · Look up another →

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Regency Care Center and Assisted Living averages 15.2 TCR (234% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living TCR series: 2018=39.7 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=5.5 · 2021=8.5 · BLS 6.5

Where Regency Care Center and Assisted Living falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 11% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Iowa alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #353 safest of 396 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Iowa.

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living (85 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Regency Care Center and Assisted Living
Regency Care Center and Assisted Living (85 employees, TCR 15.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

Regency Care Center and Assisted Living has fewer employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 8.5 8.5 5 0 0
2020 5.5 5.5 4 0 0
2019 7.2 7.2 5 0 0
2018 39.7 39.7 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IA · Norwalk

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,192 rated employers in Iowa with headcount on file · 19 employers in Norwalk, IA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Azria Health Clarinda 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SEYMOUR CROSSING 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Ms Care Center of Dekalb 15.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Riverview Health and Rehabilitation 15.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc. -- Toledo SPSC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4141_7899 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Enterprise Products (Northern MAPL) 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Produce Innovations 220 FTE
CITY-NEAR Michael Foods - Norwalk 198 FTE
CITY-NEAR Capital City Fruit, Inc. 167 FTE
CITY-NEAR Windsor Windows and Doors 161 FTE
NAT-TCR 568765-Mil-West Allis Br 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Grand Residence Lake Tahoe 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Capitol Bike Share 15.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Tmx2050 - Northern Ct 15.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE FAMCO 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Walbridge 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hunter Douglas Ceiling & Wall Products 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE 3D Systems - Lawrenceburg 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.