Generators, electrical (except motor vehicle), merchant wholesalers · Nevada

Reno

Sparks, NV · ~175 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
2.2
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Reno runs at 223% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Generators, electrical (except motor vehicle), merchant wholesalers workplace, earning a grade F.

Reno: 4.9 TCR = 223% of Generators, electrical (except motor vehicle), merchant wholesalers BLS 2.2 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Reno safety composite

Reno scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 4.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.44 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Reno held a steady TCR band

Reno's TCR held near 0.1 from 4.6 in 2016 to 4.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 8.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.6 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=4.0 · 2024=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 423610 · Sparks, NV ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 4.9 · 223% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #13/16
  • PHOTO Schaedler Yesco Dist…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~175 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Schaedler Yesco Distribution Inc. - Allentown (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Nevada employers → · Look up another →

Reno in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Reno averages 4.9 TCR (223% of the Generators, electrical (except motor vehicle), merchant wholesalers BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Reno TCR series: 2016=4.6 · 2017=6.2 · 2018=8.2 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=7.1 · 2021=3.5 · 2022=3.3 · 2023=4 · 2024=4.4 · BLS 2.2

Where Reno falls in its industry

1,190 Generators, electrical (except establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Nevada alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 16 Generators, electrical (except employers in Nevada.

Reno (175 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Reno
Reno (175 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 43 employees and a TCR of 2.4

Reno has more employees than the Generators, electrical (except motor veh median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.4 4.4 9 0 0
2023 4.0 2.2 9 0 0
2022 3.3 0.9 7 0 0
2021 3.5 2.3 6 0 0
2020 7.1 5.9 12 0 0
2019 2.8 1.4 4 0 0
2018 8.2 4.1 4 0 0
2017 6.2 5.5 9 0 0
2016 4.6 1.5 9 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

423610 · NV · Sparks

1,190 Generators, electrical (except motor vehicle), merchant wholesalers employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 4,574 rated employers in Nevada with headcount on file · 321 employers in Sparks, NV · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Schaedler Yesco Distribution Inc. - Allentown 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Royal Wholesale Electric (PC5349) 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Metairie 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6340-VIKING-MN007 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Nevada Manufacturing 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Spring Hills Home Care Services Henderson LLC 175 FTE
STATE-SIZE Geodrill LLC 176 FTE
STATE-SIZE COH Utilities Wastewater Reclamation Facility 176 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-1-Electric Ave 7,992 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue 7,272 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-NV-Sparks-Electric Avenue-Gigafactory 2,822 FTE
CITY-NEAR NVRNO - RENO HUB 1,324 FTE
NAT-TCR Granite City Roofing, Inc. 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR GMP General Service Center - Montpelier 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Alexander Labor Inc 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Lynd School 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE ShopRite Of West Nyack # 288 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advanced Poly Packaging, Inc. 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Land O'Lakes - Hicksville, NY 175 FTE
NAT-SIZE Division 24 175 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.