Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Massachusetts

Residence at great woods

Norton, MA · ~69 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
25.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Residence at great woods runs at 667% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Residence at great woods: 25.3 TCR = 667% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Residence at great woods safety composite

Residence at great woods scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

17/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 25.34 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.14 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Residence at great woods: 19.5 → 31.2 TCR

Peak year 2023 @ 31.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.44× in 2023

Residence at great woods's TCR rose 11.7 from 19.5 in 2021 to 31.2 in 2023. In 2023, DART was 0.44× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Norton, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 25.3 · 667% of ind

  • DART 11.1 DART
  • RANK #207/210
  • PHOTO Traditions of Cross …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 18 inj
  • SIZE ~69 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Traditions of Cross Keys (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

Residence at great woods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Residence at great woods averages 25.3 TCR (667% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Residence at great woods TCR series: 2021=19.5 · 2023=31.2 · BLS 3.8

Where Residence at great woods falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 1% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #207 safest of 210 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

Residence at great woods (69 employees, TCR 25.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0102030 Average employees Total Case Rate Residence at great woods
Residence at great woods (69 employees, TCR 25.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

Residence at great woods has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 31.2 11.1 14 0 0
2021 19.5 7.8 4 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · MA · Norton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 33 employers in Norton, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Traditions of Cross Keys 25.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fairwinds Redmond 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pines of Newmarket 25.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Kensington Beatrice, LLC 25.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Walsh Contracting Corp 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE S&R Corporation 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5001 Avon 69 FTE
STATE-SIZE MEC Electrical Contractors Inc 69 FTE
CITY-NEAR Horizon Beverage Company, Inc. 520 FTE
CITY-NEAR AI Distribution Center 263 FTE
CITY-NEAR New England Ice Cream Corporation 186 FTE
CITY-NEAR S09205 - Norton Hauling 181 FTE
NAT-TCR Spee Dee Delivery Service, Inc - Sioux City 25.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ridgewood Terrace 25.3 TCR
NAT-TCR The Home City Ice Company - Bridgeport - 560 25.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Grande Lake Healthcare Center 25.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Triangle Services - Palm Beach International Airport 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oracle Elevator Holdco Inc Desto 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE FBX_BWS_AV_SD 69 FTE
NAT-SIZE GPI St. Paul 69 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.