Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability · Virginia

Residential Services

Chesterfield, VA · ~188 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Residential Services runs at 111% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability workplace, earning a grade C.

Residential Services: 4.2 TCR = 111% of Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Residential Services safety composite

Residential Services scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Residential Services: 3.7 → 5.8 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.0 TCR · DART/TCR 1.21× in 2024

Residential Services's TCR rose 2.0 from 3.7 in 2016 to 5.8 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 9.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.21× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623210 · Chesterfield, VA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.2 · 111% of ind

  • DART 5.1 DART
  • RANK #24/47
  • PHOTO Pacesetters, Inc.
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~188 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pacesetters, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Virginia employers → · Look up another →

Residential Services in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Residential Services averages 4.2 TCR (111% of the Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Residential Services TCR series: 2016=3.7 · 2017=9 · 2018=3.2 · 2019=1.1 · 2020=1.1 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=4.9 · 2023=4.8 · 2024=5.8 · BLS 3.8

Where Residential Services falls in its industry

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 5.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Virginia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 47 Group homes, intellectual and employers in Virginia.

Residential Services (188 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate Residential Services
Residential Services (188 employees, TCR 4.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 65 employees and a TCR of 5.8

Residential Services has more employees than the Group homes, intellectual and developmen median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 5.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.8 5.1 9 0 0
2023 4.8 3.4 7 0 0
2022 4.9 4.2 7 0 0
2021 4.4 3.6 6 0 0
2020 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2019 1.1 1.1 2 0 0
2018 3.2 2.7 6 0 0
2017 9.0 5.4 15 0 0
2016 3.7 2.5 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623210 · VA · Chesterfield

2,261 Group homes, intellectual and developmental disability employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,673 rated employers in Virginia with headcount on file · 59 employers in Chesterfield, VA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pacesetters, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR CALAB, Inc. 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR SKILLS OF CENTRAL PA INC CENTRE STREET 4.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Father Flanagan's Central Florida 4.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Ashland 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE BAE Systems I&S - Chesapeake 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2017 - Dumfries 188 FTE
STATE-SIZE 1009 - Sterling 188 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chesterfield County Schools 8,218 FTE
CITY-NEAR General Government 1,121 FTE
CITY-NEAR Richmond Plant 646 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schools Department of Student Transportation 635 FTE
NAT-TCR Talisen Construction Corporation 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Campbellsville Plant 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Oakwood Health Campus 4.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Daily Reporter and Printers 4.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Gilco Contracting, Inc. 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pratt & Whitney Amercon 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giant Eagle #4093 188 FTE
NAT-SIZE Plant IT 188 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.