Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing · Alabama

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn

Auburn, AL · ~43 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn runs at 102% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing workplace, earning a grade C.

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn: 3.4 TCR = 102% of Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn safety composite

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

38/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 3.35 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2020→2024

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn injury rate improved

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn's TCR fell 1.2 from 7.3 in 2020 to 6.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 7.3 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.84× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=7.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=6.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 326199 · Auburn, AL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.4 · 102% of ind

  • DART 6.2 DART
  • RANK #31/65
  • PHOTO Mayhew Basque Plasti…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 4 inj
  • SIZE ~43 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Mayhew Basque Plastics LLC. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Alabama employers → · Look up another →

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn averages 3.4 TCR (102% of the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn TCR series: 2020=7.3 · 2021=3.3 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=6.2 · BLS 3.3

Where Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn falls in its industry

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli establishments

Safer than 53% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Alabama alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #31 safest of 65 Packaging, plastics (e.g., bli employers in Alabama.

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn (43 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn
Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn (43 employees, TCR 3.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 101 employees and a TCR of 3.5

Revere Plastics Systems - Auburn has fewer employees than the Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubb median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.2 6.2 2 1 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.3 3.3 1 0 0
2020 7.3 7.3 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

326199 · AL · Auburn

2,838 Packaging, plastics (e.g., blister, bubble), manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,418 rated employers in Alabama with headcount on file · 113 employers in Auburn, AL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Mayhew Basque Plastics LLC. 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Revere Plastics Systems - Jeffersonville 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gem Care Main Office 3.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Treemen Industries, Inc. 3.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Generation Fossil Gadsden Steam Plant 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Auburn Crew Headquarters 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hueytown Crew Headquarters - APC 43 FTE
STATE-SIZE Clarke-Washington Electric Membership Corporation 43 FTE
CITY-NEAR Briggs & Stratton 602 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4021-000017263 456 FTE
CITY-NEAR 000017263 AUBURN UNIVERSITY DINING 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 356 344 FTE
NAT-TCR Revere Plastics Systems - Jeffersonville 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Sofidel 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Hood Container Columbus 3.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Armada - Greencastle 3.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Sahling Kenworth - Kearney 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Conterra Hessmer 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maine Course Hospitality Group - Homewood Suites/Tru Hotels 43 FTE
NAT-SIZE 2620 Kerzell Lane 43 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.