Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing · North Carolina

Revlon Consumer Products Corp

Oxford, NC · ~1,468 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Revlon Consumer Products Corp runs at 59% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade B.

Revlon Consumer Products Corp: 2.0 TCR = 59% of Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Revlon Consumer Products Corp safety composite

Revlon Consumer Products Corp scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.54 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Revlon Consumer Products Corp held a steady TCR band

Revlon Consumer Products Corp's TCR held near 0.3 from 2.1 in 2017 to 1.8 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 2.1 TCR. In 2018, DART was 0.79× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=2.1 · 2018=1.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 325620 · Oxford, NC AT/BELOW-IND · LARGE

Grade B · TCR 2.0 · 59% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #6/6
  • PHOTO North Chicago Plant
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 56 inj
  • SIZE ~1,468 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: North Chicago Plant (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

Revlon Consumer Products Corp in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Revlon Consumer Products Corp averages 2.0 TCR (59% of the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Revlon Consumer Products Corp TCR series: 2017=2.1 · 2018=1.8 · BLS 3.3

Where Revlon Consumer Products Corp falls in its industry

260 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos establishments

Safer than 55% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #6 safest of 6 Toilet preparations (e.g., cos employers in North Carolina.

Revlon Consumer Products Corp (1,468 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Revlon Consumer Products Corp
Revlon Consumer Products Corp (1,468 employees, TCR 2.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 161 employees and a TCR of 2.3

Revlon Consumer Products Corp has more employees than the Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, de median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.8 1.5 26 1 0
2017 2.1 1.6 30 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

325620 · NC · Oxford

260 Toilet preparations (e.g., cosmetics, deodorants, perfumes) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 28 employers in Oxford, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR North Chicago Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tri Tech Laboratories LLC 2.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oxford NC Plant 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Coty Professional 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison 1,469 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thomas Built Buses 1,467 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMZL : DLT1 1,465 FTE
STATE-SIZE Blue Ridge HealthCare Hospitals, Inc. 1,461 FTE
CITY-NEAR Revlon 1,415 FTE
CITY-NEAR Granville County 319 FTE
CITY-NEAR CertainTeed Saint-Gobain 273 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oxford (BAMG) 232 FTE
NAT-TCR Broadcast Electronics 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #735 (Aitkin, MN) 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Northeast Arkansas Motors Inc DBA Honda of Jonesboro 2.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Field Sales Central 2.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Hoffman Enclosures Inc 1,468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Porter Regional Hospital 1,468 FTE
NAT-SIZE St Catherine of Siena Medical Center 1,468 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - AUS3 1,468 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.