Annealing metals and metal products for the trade · Pennsylvania

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc

Bedford, PA · ~37 workers · 7 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.4
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc runs at 73% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Annealing metals and metal products for the trade workplace, earning a grade B.

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc: 2.4 TCR = 73% of Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS 3.3 · 7y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc safety composite

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 78% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 41%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.42 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc: 3.1 → 5.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 5.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.16× in 2024

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc's TCR rose 2.5 from 3.1 in 2017 to 5.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.16× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332811 · Bedford, PA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.4 · 73% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #4/13
  • PHOTO ASC Process Systems …
  • BOOK 7y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: ASC Process Systems - Valencia (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc averages 2.4 TCR (73% of the Annealing metals and metal products for the trade BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc TCR series: 2017=3.1 · 2018=2.4 · 2020=0 · 2021=2.9 · 2022=0 · 2023=2.9 · 2024=5.6 · BLS 3.3

Where Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc falls in its industry

248 Annealing metals and metal pro establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #4 safest of 13 Annealing metals and metal pro employers in Pennsylvania.

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc (37 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,000 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc
Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc (37 employees, TCR 2.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 38 employees and a TCR of 4.2

Rex Heat Treat - Bedford Inc has fewer employees than the Annealing metals and metal products for median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 5.6 2.8 2 0 0
2023 2.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 2.4 2.4 1 0 0
2017 3.1 3.1 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332811 · PA · Bedford

248 Annealing metals and metal products for the trade employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 43 employers in Bedford, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR ASC Process Systems - Valencia 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR CPP - Steel Treaters 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bryon Products Inc 2.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR NORTH AMERICAN STAINLESS - GHENT 2.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Packing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packing House 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adams Electric Cooperative Inc. Headquarters Office 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Claverack REC - Wysox 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 6047 937 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6047 831 FTE
CITY-NEAR Omni Bedford Springs Resort 494 FTE
CITY-NEAR Omni Bedford Springs 470 FTE
NAT-TCR Todd Construction, Inc. Main Office 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR ASC Process Systems - Valencia 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Bradenton- #208 2.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Franklin 2.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Madsen Fixture & Millwork Inc building 1 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Lanly Company 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE O'Malley Construction Inc 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Yu-Ai Kai Japanese American Community Senior Service 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.